ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2020
Contemporary rotating hinge arthroplasty can safely be recommended in complex primary surgery.
Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reconstruction of mechanical leg axis using non-modular cemented hinged prosthesis in complex primary total knee arthroplasty.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Article
- Comparative Functional and Isokinetic Analysis between Implants with Posterior Stabilization and Rotating Hinge Total Knee Arthroplasty.Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2024Article
- Indications, clinical outcome and survival of rotating hinge total knee arthroplasty in a retrospective study of 63 primary and revision cases.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2023Article
- Constraint in complex primary total knee arthroplasty: rotating hinge versus condylar constrained implants.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2022Article
- Primary complex total knee arthroplasty with severe varus deformity and large bone defects: mid-term results of a consecutive series treated with primary implants.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2022Article
- Mid-term results and survival rates following a single-design rotating hinge knee arthroplasty in non-tumor conditions in a Pakistani population.Knee surgery & related research · 2021Article
- Preoperative mechanical axis has no influence on reoperation rate in primary rotating-hinge knee arthroplasty.Journal of orthopaedicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe objective was to evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes, survival rate and complications of primary contemporary rotating hinged total knee arthroplasty (CRH-TKA).
methodsThrough a national multicenter retrospective study (14 centers), 112 primary CRH-TKA performed between 2006 and 2011 were included. Indications were: severe frontal plane deformity (55%), inflammatory, constitutional, congenital or post-trauma arthritis (26%), ligament laxity (10%), primary osteoarthritis (9%). Population was elderly (68 ± 13), sedentary (37.5% with a Devane score ≥ 3) and with important comorbidities (87% with ASA score ≥ 2). A clinical (KSS, Oxford scores) and radiological evaluation (implant loosening), as well as survival and reoperation rates assessment, were performed.
resultsAt last follow-up (7 ± 3 years), KSS and Oxford scores were 64 ± 43 and 33 ± 10 each with a significant improvement of both scores overtime (respectively, p = 0.047 and p < 0.001). Twenty-eight complications (25%) were reported: 12 infections, 6 stiffness, 5 aseptic loosening and 5 patellofemoral instabilities. All in all, 91% (n = 102) of implants were still sealed and in place, 6% (n = 7) required revision and 3% (n = 3) were loose but could not undergo revision due to weak general health status. Mortality rate (18%, n = 20), linked to comorbidities, was high.
conclusionClinical outcomes and survival of primary CRH-TKA are acceptable given the difficult and complex clinical situations it faced, but with high infection rate. In primary surgery, for patients with severe deformity, bone loss or ligament laxity, the use of CRH-TKA can be recommended. The choice of these implants must remain cautious and limited to situations not allowing the use of less constrained implants. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective therapeutic and cohort study, Level III; retrospective case series, Level IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.