Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31263788›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2019

Endangered island endemic plants have vulnerable genomes.

Tomoko Hamabata, Gohta Kinoshita, Kazuki Kurita, Ping-Lin Cao, Motomi Ito, Jin Murata, Yoshiteru Komaki, Yuji Isagi, Takashi Makino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tomoko Hamabata1Graduate School of Life Sciences, Tohoku University, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8578 Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4316-4497
Gohta Kinoshita2Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502 Japan.
Kazuki Kurita2Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502 Japan.
Ping-Lin Cao1Graduate School of Life Sciences, Tohoku University, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8578 Japan.
Motomi Ito3Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, University of Tokyo, Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8902 Japan.
Jin Murata4Koishikawa Botanical Garden, Graduate School of Science, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 112-0001 Japan.
Yoshiteru Komaki4Koishikawa Botanical Garden, Graduate School of Science, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 112-0001 Japan.
Yuji Isagi2Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8502 Japan.
Takashi Makino1Graduate School of Life Sciences, Tohoku University, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8578 Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4600-9353

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Loss of genetic diversity is known to decrease the fitness of species and is a critical factor that increases extinction risk. However, there is little evidence for higher vulnerability and extinction risk in endangered species based on genomic differences between endangered and non-endangered species. This is true even in the case of functional loci, which are more likely to relate to the fitness of species than neutral loci. Here, we compared the genome-wide genetic diversity, proportion of duplicated genes (

Indexed as

Endangered SpeciesGenetic VariationGenome, PlantIslandsContig MappingEcologyGenomicsGeographyHeterozygoteNucleotidesPlantsRiskSequence Analysis, RNASpecies SpecificityNucleotidesConservation biologyEvolutionary ecologyEvolutionary geneticsPlant genetics

Identifiers

PMID31263788
PMCPMC6597543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.