ArticleCureus2019
Health Care Access and Utilization by Nepalese Adults in Connecticut.
Article in Cureus, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Neurosurgical Immigrant Experience in Italy: Analysis of a Northeast Tertiary Center.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Access to healthcare and the utilization of health services at both the state and national levels are frequent areas of study, specifically in major ethnic populations such as White, Black, and Hispanic/Latino. However, there are few studies assessing healthcare access and utilization in the Nepalese communities in the United States (U.S.), despite the rapidly growing population of Nepalese immigrants. Methods To explore this issue, we conducted a questionnaire-based survey of Nepalese adults in Connecticut (CT). Results When compared to the reporting of the general CT population, a greater percentage of this survey's respondents report having trouble accessing necessary care (21.1% vs 11.0% in CT). Despite this, more Nepalese adults report satisfaction with the provider in terms of time spent during the visit (81.8% vs 76.0% in CT) and a consideration of values and beliefs during treatment (86.2% vs 70.0% in CT). In comparison with previous national reporting of the general U.S. population, Nepalese adults in the survey tend to have fewer total health care visits annually (87.1% reporting between zero and three visits vs. 64.7% in the U.S.). They also reported fewer dental visits (60.6% vs 71.0% in the U.S.). Conclusion While this novel study is one of the few examining health in the Nepalese population in the U.S., it serves as a foundation for future research in this area. Additionally, the results of the study highlight important disparities that local Nepalese organizations can use to design initiatives to improve this population's health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.