Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31263598›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of vascular medicine2019

The Clinical Rationale for the Sentry Bioconvertible Inferior Vena Cava Filter for the Prevention of Pulmonary Embolism.

Michael D Dake, Gary M Ansel, Matthew S Johnson, Robert Mendes, H Bob Smouse

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of vascular medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01975090 (A Prospective, Multi-Center Study of the Novate Sentry Bioconvertible Vena Cava Filter), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01975090 nacompletednot on this map

A Prospective, Multi-Center Study of the Novate Sentry Bioconvertible Vena Cava Filter

TypeinterventionalSponsorBoston Scientific CorporationRan2014 to 2018Enrolled129ConditionsPulmonary Embolism, Deep Vein ThrombosisArmsSENTRY IVC Filter
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michael D DakeDepartments of Medical Imaging and of Surgery, University of Arizona Health Sciences, Tucson, Arizona, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2817-0875
Gary M AnselDepartment of Cardiology & Vascular Medicine, OhioHealth/Riverside Methodist Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Matthew S JohnsonDepartment of Vascular & Interventional Radiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Robert MendesDepartment of Vascular Surgery, UNC Rex Hospital, NC Heart and Vascular Research, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
H Bob SmouseDepartment of Interventional Radiology, OSF Saint Francis Medical Center, Peoria, Illinois, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Sentry inferior vena cava (IVC) filter is designed to provide temporary protection against pulmonary embolism (PE) during transient high-risk periods and then to bioconvert after 60 days after implantation. At the time of bioconversion, the device's nitinol arms retract from the filtering position into the caval wall. Subsequently, the stable stent-like nitinol frame is endothelialized. The Sentry bioconvertible IVC filter has been evaluated in a multicenter investigational-device-exemption pivotal trial (NCT01975090) of 129 patients with documented deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or PE, or at temporary risk of developing DVT or PE, and with contraindications to anticoagulation. Successful filter conversion was observed in 95.7% of patients at 6 months (110/115) and 96.4% at 12 months (106/110). Through 12 months, there were no cases of symptomatic PE. The rationale for development of the Sentry bioconvertible device includes the following considerations: (1) the period of highest risk of PE for the vast majority of patients occurs within the first 60 days after an index event, with most of the PEs occurring in the first 30 days; (2) the design of retrievable IVC filters to support their removal after a transitory high-PE-risk period has, in practice, been associated with insecure filter dynamics and time-dependent complications including tilting, fracture, embolization, migration, and IVC perforation; (3) most retrievable IVC filters are placed for temporary protection, but for a variety of reasons they are not removed in any more than half of implanted patients, and when removal is attempted, the procedure is not always successful even with advanced techniques; and (4) analysis of Medicare hospital data suggests that payment for the retrieval procedure does not routinely compensate for expense. The Sentry device is not intended for removal after bioconversion. In initial clinical use, complications have been limited. Long-term results for the Sentry bioconvertible IVC filter are anticipated soon.

Identifiers

PMID31263598
PMCPMC6556320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.