Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31263509›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology2019

The efficacy of prophylactic pancreatic stents against complications of post-endoscopic papillectomy or endoscopic ampullectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yining Wang, Miao Qi, Yuanzhen Hao, Junbo Hong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Stent placement in pancreatic disease, when, which and why? - a current perspective.Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. [Endoscopic Management of Ampulla of Vater Tumors].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Lost ampullary opening post endoscopic submucosal dissection: EUS-guided rendezvous shows the path.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2025
    Article
  7. Observational
  8. Clinical outcomes: endoscopic resection of duodenal ampullary lesions.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yining WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3454-9881
Miao QiDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Yuanzhen HaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Junbo HongDepartment of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330006, China.
Nanchang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndoscopic resection has been increasingly adopted for neoplasms in the major duodenal papilla. Previous studies have reached varying conclusions on whether prophylactic pancreatic stent (PS) placement is an effective measure against post-procedure complications. We aimed to investigate whether PS could reduce the incidence of post-procedure complications.

methodsThe

results23 RCSs (1001 subjects) and 2 RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Meta-analysis of the RCSs showed that prophylactic PS decreased the odds of post-procedure pancreatitis (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.36-1.40;

conclusionsPS placement was prophylactic against post-procedure complications although not significantly. Sensitivity analysis suggests the significant effect of prophylactic PS against post-procedure pancreatitis. More RCTs are required to validate the statistical significance of our results and potentially relevant characteristics improving the prophylactic efficacy of stents.

Indexed as

post-procedure complicationsprophylactic pancreatic stent

Identifiers

PMID31263509
PMCPMC6595661
OpenAlexW2955419138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.