Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31263487›Full record

ArticleCurrent zoology2019

Sex differences in cognition and their relationship to male mate choice.

Jason Keagy, Ross Minter, Robin M Tinghitella

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current zoology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Linking individual fitness to the evolution of cognition.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A reinvestigation of cognitive styles in sticklebacks: decision success varies with behavioral type.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
  15. Does brain size affect mate choice? An experimental examination in pygmy halfbeaks.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
  16. Smart mating: the cognitive ability of females influences their preference for male cognitive ability.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jason KeagyDepartment of Animal Biology, School of Integrative Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1235-4837
Ross MinterLinda Crnic Institute for Down Syndrome, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Robin M TinghitellaDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Denver, Denver, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0049-5539

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Male cognition has gained recognition as an important potential player in sexual selection. A number of studies have found positive correlations between male sexual signals and cognitive performance and/or female preferences for males with better cognitive performance, although other studies have not found these relationships. Sex roles can differ dramatically, and sex differences in selection on cognition likely follow from the different tasks associated with these sex roles. Here, using threespine stickleback

Indexed as

cognitiondetour taskmutual mate choicesexual selectionthreespine stickleback

Identifiers

PMID31263487
PMCPMC6595418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.