Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31263098›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

Jason S Wilson, Alicia M Churchill-Angus, Simon P Davies, Svetlana E Sedelnikova, Svetomir B Tzokov, John B Rafferty, Per A Bullough, Claudine Bisson, Patrick J Baker

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Cryo-EM structure of detergent-boundbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Crystal structure and activity of a de novo enzyme, ferric enterobactin esterase Syn-F4.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Bacterial pore-forming toxins.Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. A tripartite cytolytic toxin formed byProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jason S WilsonDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Sheffield, Firth Court, Western Bank, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S10 2TN, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6967-0809
Alicia M Churchill-AngusDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Sheffield, Firth Court, Western Bank, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S10 2TN, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0918-2333
Simon P DaviesDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Sheffield, Firth Court, Western Bank, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S10 2TN, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9893-2401
Svetlana E SedelnikovaDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Sheffield, Firth Court, Western Bank, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S10 2TN, UK.
Svetomir B TzokovDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Sheffield, Firth Court, Western Bank, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S10 2TN, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7256-5279
John B RaffertyDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Sheffield, Firth Court, Western Bank, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S10 2TN, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1183-7474
Per A BulloughDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Sheffield, Firth Court, Western Bank, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S10 2TN, UK.
Claudine BissonDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Sheffield, Firth Court, Western Bank, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S10 2TN, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9430-6822
Patrick J BakerDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, University of Sheffield, Firth Court, Western Bank, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S10 2TN, UK. p.baker@sheffield.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1995-5643
University of Sheffield · GBUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/D524975/1RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/F016832/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The alpha helical CytolysinA family of pore forming toxins (α-PFT) contains single, two, and three component members. Structures of the single component Eschericia coli ClyA and the two component Yersinia enterolytica YaxAB show both undergo conformational changes from soluble to pore forms, and oligomerization to produce the active pore. Here we identify tripartite α-PFTs in pathogenic Gram negative bacteria, including Aeromonas hydrophila (AhlABC). We show that the AhlABC toxin requires all three components for maximal cell lysis. We present structures of pore components which describe a bi-fold hinge mechanism for soluble to pore transition in AhlB and a contrasting tetrameric assembly employed by soluble AhlC to hide their hydrophobic membrane associated residues. We propose a model of pore assembly where the AhlC tetramer dissociates, binds a single membrane leaflet, recruits AhlB promoting soluble to pore transition, prior to AhlA binding to form the active hydrophilic lined pore.

Indexed as

Aeromonas hydrophilaBacterial ToxinsCrystallography, X-RayHemolysin ProteinsHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsModels, MolecularPore Forming Cytotoxic ProteinsBacterial ToxinsHemolysin ProteinsPore Forming Cytotoxic Proteins

Identifiers

PMID31263098
PMCPMC6602965
OpenAlexW2953809352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.