Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31262949›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Sex Differences in Cognitive Flexibility and Resting Brain Networks in Middle-Aged Marmosets.

M LaClair, M Febo, B Nephew, N J Gervais, G Poirier, K Workman, S Chumachenko, L Payne, M C Moore, J A King and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Age-related decline in executive function as a hallmark of cognitive ageing in primates: an overview of cognitive and neurobiological studies.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

M LaClairNeuroscience and Behavior Program, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003 mlaclair@fairfield.edu alacreuse@psych.umass.edu.
M FeboDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Florida, Gainsville, FL 32610.
B NephewWorcester Polytechnic Institute, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655.
N J GervaisCenter for Neuroendocrine Studies, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003.ORCID 0000-0003-2773-7830
G PoirierCenter for Comparative Neuroimaging, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655.
K WorkmanPsychological and Brain Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003.
S ChumachenkoCenter for Comparative Neuroimaging, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655.
L PayneCenter for Comparative Neuroimaging, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655.
M C MooreCenter for Comparative Neuroimaging, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655.
J A KingWorcester Polytechnic Institute, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655.
A LacreuseNeuroscience and Behavior Program, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003 mlaclair@fairfield.edu alacreuse@psych.umass.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-2890-9649
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst · USWorcester Polytechnic Institute · USFairfield University · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

Sex differences in cognitive and brain aging: a primate modelR01AG046266 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST · PI LACREUSE, AGNES · 2014 to 2018
$2.1M
4.7T Magnet System UpgradeS10OD018132 · OD · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI KING, JEAN A · 2014 to 2014
$598k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG046266NIH HHS S10 OD018132
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sex differences in human cognitive performance are well characterized. However, the neural correlates of these differences remain elusive. This issue may be clarified using nonhuman primates, for which sociocultural influences are minimized. We used the marmoset (

Indexed as

Sex CharacteristicsAnimalsBehavior, AnimalBrainCallithrixExecutive FunctionFemaleLocomotionMaleNeural PathwaysReversal Learninganimal modelscognitive flexibilityexecutive functionresting state functional connectivityreversal learningsex differences

Identifiers

PMID31262949
PMCPMC6658914
OpenAlexW2954438570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.