Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31262818›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Ecomorphological diversification in squamates from conserved pattern of cranial integration.

Akinobu Watanabe, Anne-Claire Fabre, Ryan N Felice, Jessica A Maisano, Johannes Müller, Anthony Herrel, Anjali Goswami

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
38.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 174 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. eLife · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Cranial modularity drives phenotypic diversification and adaptive radiation of Antarctic icefishes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Akinobu WatanabeDepartment of Anatomy, New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine, Old Westbury, NY 11568; awatanab@nyit.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5057-4772
Anne-Claire FabreLife Sciences Department, Vertebrates Division, Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom.
Ryan N FeliceLife Sciences Department, Vertebrates Division, Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9201-9213
Jessica A MaisanoJackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712.
Johannes MüllerMuseum für Naturkunde, Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Berlin 10115, Germany.
Anthony HerrelDépartement Adaptations du Vivant, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris 75005, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0991-4434
Anjali GoswamiLife Sciences Department, Vertebrates Division, Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom.
Natural History Museum · GBMuseum für Naturkunde · DEThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Factors intrinsic and extrinsic to organisms dictate the course of morphological evolution but are seldom considered together in comparative analyses. Among vertebrates, squamates (lizards and snakes) exhibit remarkable morphological and developmental variations that parallel their incredible ecological spectrum. However, this exceptional diversity also makes systematic quantification and analysis of their morphological evolution challenging. We present a squamate-wide, high-density morphometric analysis of the skull across 181 modern and extinct species to identify the primary drivers of their cranial evolution within a unified, quantitative framework. Diet and habitat preferences, but not reproductive mode, are major influences on skull-shape evolution across squamates, with fossorial and aquatic taxa exhibiting convergent and rapid changes in skull shape. In lizards, diet is associated with the shape of the rostrum, reflecting its use in grasping prey, whereas snakes show a correlation between diet and the shape of posterior skull bones important for gape widening. Similarly, we observe the highest rates of evolution and greatest disparity in regions associated with jaw musculature in lizards, whereas those forming the jaw articulation evolve faster in snakes. In addition, high-resolution ancestral cranial reconstructions from these data support a terrestrial, nonfossorial origin for snakes. Despite their disparate evolutionary trends, lizards and snakes unexpectedly share a common pattern of trait integration, with the highest correlations in the occiput, jaw articulation, and palate. We thus demonstrate that highly diverse phenotypes, exemplified by lizards and snakes, can and do arise from differential selection acting on conserved patterns of phenotypic integration.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionPhenotypeAnimalsEcosystemFeeding BehaviorFossilsLizardsPhylogenySkullSnakesgeometric morphometricsintegration and modularitymacroevolutionskullSquamata

Identifiers

PMID31262818
PMCPMC6642379
OpenAlexW2953783979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.