Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31262812›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

Female bed bugs (

Michael T Siva-Jothy, Weihao Zhong, Richard Naylor, Louise Heaton, William Hentley, Ewan Harney

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Regional specialization, polyploidy, and seminal fluid transcripts in theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael T Siva-JothyDepartment of Animal & Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, S10 2TN Sheffield, United Kingdom m.siva-jothy@sheffield.ac.uk ewan.harney@liverpool.ac.uk.
Weihao ZhongDepartment of Animal & Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, S10 2TN Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Richard NaylorDepartment of Animal & Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, S10 2TN Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Louise HeatonDepartment of Animal & Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, S10 2TN Sheffield, United Kingdom.
William HentleyDepartment of Animal & Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, S10 2TN Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Ewan HarneyDepartment of Animal & Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, S10 2TN Sheffield, United Kingdom m.siva-jothy@sheffield.ac.uk ewan.harney@liverpool.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0680-3253
University of Sheffield · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Not all encounters with pathogens are stochastic and insects can adjust their immune management in relation to cues associated with the likelihood of infection within a life cycle as well as across generations. In this study we show that female insects (bed bugs) up-regulate immune function in their copulatory organ in anticipation of mating by using feeding cues. Male bed bugs only mate with recently fed females and do so by traumatic insemination (TI). Consequently, there is a tight temporal correlation between female feeding and the likelihood of her being infected via TI. Females that received predictable access to food (and therefore predictable insemination and infection cycles) up-regulated induced immunity (generic antibacterial activity) in anticipation of feeding and mating. Females that received unpredictable (but the same mean periodicity) access to food did not. Females that anticipated mating-associated immune insult received measurable fitness benefits (survival and lifetime reproductive success) despite laying eggs at the same rate as females that were not able to predict these cycles. Given that mating is a time of increased likelihood of infection in many organisms, and is often associated with temporal cues such as courtship and/or feeding, we propose that anticipation of mating-associated infection in females may be more widespread than is currently evidenced.

Indexed as

AnimalsBedbugsCuesFeeding BehaviorFemaleGastrointestinal TractImmunityInseminationMaleMating Preference, AnimalSex Factorsbed bugimmune primingreproductive immune anticipationtraumatic insemination

Identifiers

PMID31262812
PMCPMC6642350
OpenAlexW2954033983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.