Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31262727›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of biological chemistry2019

Fast photochemical oxidation of proteins (FPOP): A powerful mass spectrometry-based structural proteomics tool.

Danté T Johnson, Luciano H Di Stefano, Lisa M Jones

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. State-of-the-Art and Future Directions in Structural Proteomics.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Proteomics of the heart.Physiological reviews · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Dimethylthiourea as a Quencher in Hydroxyl Radical Protein Footprinting Experiments.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Danté T JohnsonDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland 21201.
Luciano H Di StefanoDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland 21201.
Lisa M JonesDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland 21201. Electronic address: ljones@rx.umaryland.edu.
University of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

EXPAND PARTICIPATION BY MINORITIES IN BIOMEDICAL SCIENCER25GM055036 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY · PI SUMMERS, MICHAEL FINLEY · 1996 to 2021
$16.9M
Development of a novel pulse-chase in-cell footprinting method for protein folding analysisR01GM128985 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI JONES, LISA M · 2018 to 2021
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM128985NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM055036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fast photochemical oxidation of proteins (FPOP) is a MS-based method that has proved useful in studies of protein structures, interactions, conformations, and protein folding. The success of this method relies on the irreversible labeling of solvent-exposed amino acid side chains by hydroxyl radicals. FPOP generates these radicals through laser-induced photolysis of hydrogen peroxide. The data obtained provide residue-level resolution of protein structures and interactions on the microsecond timescale, enabling investigations of fast processes such as protein folding and weak protein-protein interactions. An extensive comparison between FPOP and other footprinting techniques gives insight on their complementarity as well as the robustness of FPOP to provide unique structural information once unattainable. The versatility of this method is evidenced by both the heterogeneity of samples that can be analyzed by FPOP and the myriad of applications for which the method has been successfully used: from proteins of varying size to intact cells. This review discusses the wide applications of this technique and highlights its high potential. Applications including, but not limited to, protein folding, membrane proteins, structure elucidation, and epitope mapping are showcased. Furthermore, the use of FPOP has been extended to probing proteins in cells and

Indexed as

Chromatography, High Pressure LiquidHydroxyl RadicalLasersMass SpectrometryOxidation-ReductionProtein FoldingProteinsProteomicsHydroxyl RadicalProteinsbiologicshydroxyl radical footprintingmass spectrometry (MS)molecular modelingprotein foldingprotein structureproteomics

Identifiers

PMID31262727
PMCPMC6690683
OpenAlexW2955585664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.