Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31262401›Full record

ArticleeLife2019

Positive and negative incentive contrasts lead to relative value perception in ants.

Stephanie Wendt, Kim S Strunk, Jürgen Heinze, Andreas Roider, Tomer J Czaczkes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Learning modifies attention during bumblebee visual search.Behavioral ecology and sociobiology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Irrational risk aversion in an ant.Animal cognition · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stephanie WendtAnimal Comparative Economics Laboratory, Institute of Zoology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8950-2845
Kim S StrunkSchool of Business, Economics and Information Systems, Chair of Management, People and Information, University of Passau, Passau, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2896-814X
Jürgen HeinzeInstitute of Zoology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Andreas RoiderDepartment of Economics, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Tomer J CzaczkesAnimal Comparative Economics Laboratory, Institute of Zoology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1350-4975

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Emmy-Noether-Grant (Grant number CZ 237/1-1)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans usually assess things not according to their absolute value, but relative to reference points - a main tenant of Prospect Theory. For example, people rate a new salary relative to previous salaries and salaries of their peers, rather than absolute income. We demonstrate a similar effect in an insect: ants expecting to find low-quality food showed higher acceptance of medium-quality food than ants expecting medium quality, and vice versa for high expectations. Further experiments demonstrate that these contrast effects arise from cognitive rather than mere sensory or pre-cognitive perceptual causes. Social information gained inside the nest can also serve as a reference point: the quality of food received from other ants affected the perceived value of food found later. Value judgement is a key element in decision making, and thus relative value perception strongly influences which option is chosen and ultimately how all animals make decisions.

Indexed as

Decision MakingFeeding BehaviorMotivationAnimalsAntsHumansecologyevolutionary biologyforagingincentive contrastsprospect theoryrecruitmentrelative value perceptionsuccessive contrasts

Identifiers

PMID31262401
PMCPMC6606023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.