Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31262305›Full record

ArticleHarm reduction journal2019

Research 101: A process for developing local guidelines for ethical research in heavily researched communities.

Scott D Neufeld, Jule Chapman, Nicolas Crier, Samona Marsh, Jim McLeod, Lindsay A Deane

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Harm reduction journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. "Drug and alcohol dependence reports · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. IRBs and the Protection-Inclusion Dilemma: Finding a Balance.The American journal of bioethics : AJOB · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Scott D NeufeldSimon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, V5A 1S6, BC, Canada. sdn2@sfu.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-8086-7752
Jule ChapmanSex Workers United Against Violence, 334 Alexander St, Vancouver, BC, V6A 1C3, Canada.
Nicolas CrierMegaphone Magazine Speaker's Bureau, 312 Main St, Vancouver, BC, V6A 2 T2, Canada.
Samona MarshSex Workers United Against Violence, 334 Alexander St, Vancouver, BC, V6A 1C3, Canada.
Jim McLeodIllicit: A Shadow Story, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Lindsay A DeaneSimon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, V5A 1S6, BC, Canada.
Simon Fraser University · CACentre for Drug Research and Development · CASpinal Cord Injury BC · CA

Funding

Simon Fraser University N/ASocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (CA) 157886
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMarginalized communities often attract more than their share of research. Too often, this research benefits researchers disproportionately and leaves such communities feeling exploited, misrepresented, and exhausted. The Downtown Eastside (DTES) neighborhood of Vancouver, Canada, has been the site of multiple public health epidemics related to injection drug use as well as the site of much community-led resistance and struggle that has led to the development of cutting-edge harm reduction interventions (e.g., North America's first supervised injection facility, Insite) and a strong sense of community organization. This background has made the DTES one of the most heavily researched communities in the world. Amidst ongoing experiences of unethical or disrespectful research engagement in the neighborhood, a collaboration between local academic researchers and community representatives developed to explore how we could work together to encourage more respectful, community-responsive research and discourage exploitative or disrespectful research.

methodsWe developed a series of six weekly workshops called "Research 101." These workshops brought together approximately 13 representatives from peer-based organizations in the DTES with a variety of experiences with research. Research 101 created space for community members themselves to discuss the pitfalls and potential of research in their neighborhood and to express community expectations for more ethical and respectful research.

resultsWe summarized workshop discussions in a co-authored "Manifesto for Ethical Research in the Downtown Eastside." This document serves as a resource to empower community organizations to develop more equitable partnerships with researchers and help researchers ground their work in the principles of locally developed "community ethics." Manifesto guidelines include increased researcher transparency, community-based ethical review of projects, empowering peer researchers in meaningful roles within a research project, and taking seriously the need for reciprocity in the research exchange.

conclusionsResearch 101 was a process for eliciting and presenting a local vision of "community ethics" in a heavily researched neighborhood to guide researchers and empower community organizations. Our ongoing work involves building consensus for these guidelines within the community and communicating these expectations to researchers and ethics offices at local universities. We also describe how our Research 101 process could be replicated in other heavily researched communities.

Indexed as

Ethics, ResearchBritish ColumbiaEducationEmpowermentHarm ReductionHumansInterdisciplinary CommunicationIntersectoral CollaborationSocial MarginalizationSocial ProblemsSubstance Abuse, IntravenousCommunity-based researchCommunity workshopsEmpowering local knowledgeLocal guidelines for ethical researchPeer research

Identifiers

PMID31262305
PMCPMC6604375
OpenAlexW2955969132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.