ArticleBMC cancer2019
Identifying the need for specialized palliative care in adult cancer patients - development and validation of a screening procedure based on proxy assessment by physicians and filter questions.
Article in BMC cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Designing a need-based program for relieving psychological distress of family caregivers of leukemia patients: a randomized controlled trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021Trial
- Comparison of different proxy approaches to determine the need for specialized palliative care in patients with incurable cancer.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Palliative care and vascular surgery: status quo, needs, barriers and current challenges from the perspective of vascular surgery specialists.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Scan, Screen, Support-A Digital Pathway for Assessing Supportive Care Needs in Oncology: Implementation Study.JMIR cancer · 2026Article
- Adaptation and Validation of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT): A Quantitative Methodological Study.Journal of advanced nursing · 2025Observational
- Assessing the sensitivity and acceptability of the Royal Marsden Palliative Care Referral "Triggers" Tool for outpatients with cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024Article
- Unscheduled Hospital Admission as a Prognostic Factor in the Oncologic Patient: A Retrospective Study.Cureus · 2024Article
- Examining Variability in Intra-Hospital Patient Referrals to Specialized Palliative Care: A Comprehensive Analysis of Disciplines and Mortality.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Interrater agreement of multi-professional case review as reference standard for specialist palliative care need: a mixed-methods study.BMC palliative care · 2023Article
- Palliative care needs of Jordanian women's experience of living with stroke: a descriptive phenomenological study.BMC palliative care · 2023Article
- Palliative care as a digital working world (PALLADiUM) - A mixed-method research protocol.BMC palliative care · 2023Article
- Palliative care outpatients in a German comprehensive cancer center-identifying indicators for early and late referral.BMC palliative care · 2022Article
- Development of the palliative care referral system: proposal of a tool for the referral of cancer patients to specialized palliative care.BMC palliative care · 2022Article
- Outpatient palliative care referral system (PCRS) for patients with advanced cancer: an impact evaluation protocol.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Article
- Contribution of Synthetic Data Generation towards an Improved Patient Stratification in Palliative Care.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- Models of Integration of Specialized Palliative Care with Oncology.Current treatment options in oncology · 2021Review
- Where do GPs find patients with possible palliative care needs? A cross-sectional descriptive study.BJGP open · 2021Article
- Severe symptoms and very low quality-of-life among outpatients newly diagnosed with advanced cancer: data from a multicenter cohort study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020Article
- Anxiety, depression and psychosocial needs are the most frequent concerns reported by patients: preliminary results of a comparative explorative analysis of two hospital-based palliative care teams in Germany and Japan.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOne challenge in caring for cancer patients with incurable disease is the adequate identification of those in need for specialized palliative care (SPC). The study's aim was to validate an easy to use phenomenological screening tool.
methodsThe German tool is based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Palliative Care guidelines and contains ten items in five domains that focus e.g. on diagnosis, functional status, complications, comorbidities, and palliative care relevant problems such as symptom management, distress, and support of family and team members. Sum score ranges from 0 to 14 (no need to great need). Assessment to identify SPC needs was done in university hospital wards between 1 and 08/2017 by health care professionals on admission of the patient if the disease was incurable and expected prognosis < 12 months. The Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale (IPOS, staff version), an outcome assessment instrument for palliative care that consists of ten items, served as external criterion; in sub samples inter-rater/test-retest were performed.
resultsData from 208 patients with incurable disease and life expectancy < 12 months (54.8% female; average age 63.5 years, range 21-96) were assessed using the tool. The tool has good convergent validity; the correlation between the sum scores of IPOS and our tool showed a significant and substantial effect. The sum score was independent of the patient's age, gender and primary diagnosis. Patients who already were in contact with SPC had significantly higher screening scores than patients without. With a cut point of ≥ 5, 80.8% of the screened patients were in need for SPC. Cronbach's alpha was α = .600. Rater agreement (inter-rater, test-retest) varied between single items. Correlation coefficients showed significant substantial effects.
conclusionsThis is the first validation of a screening procedure in German language identifying SPC needs of adult patients with advanced cancer and the first using filter questions as a pre-screening. Proxy assessment of SPC needs by physicians in cancer care settings is feasible and the suggested tool presents a valid instrument to trigger a PC consultation.
trial registrationThe study was not registered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.