Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31262285›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2019

Identifying the need for specialized palliative care in adult cancer patients - development and validation of a screening procedure based on proxy assessment by physicians and filter questions.

Christoph Ostgathe, Kim N Wendt, Maria Heckel, Sandra Kurkowski, Carsten Klein, Stefan W Krause, Florian S Fuchs, Christian M Bayer, Stephanie Stiel

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Designing a need-based program for relieving psychological distress of family caregivers of leukemia patients: a randomized controlled trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Assessing the sensitivity and acceptability of the Royal Marsden Palliative Care Referral "Triggers" Tool for outpatients with cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Models of Integration of Specialized Palliative Care with Oncology.Current treatment options in oncology · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Severe symptoms and very low quality-of-life among outpatients newly diagnosed with advanced cancer: data from a multicenter cohort study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christoph OstgatheComprehensive Cancer Center CCC Erlangen - EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Kim N WendtComprehensive Cancer Center CCC Erlangen - EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Maria HeckelComprehensive Cancer Center CCC Erlangen - EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany. maria.heckel@uk-erlangen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6212-2562
Sandra KurkowskiComprehensive Cancer Center CCC Erlangen - EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Carsten KleinComprehensive Cancer Center CCC Erlangen - EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Stefan W KrauseComprehensive Cancer Center CCC Erlangen - EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Florian S FuchsComprehensive Cancer Center CCC Erlangen - EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Christian M BayerComprehensive Cancer Center CCC Erlangen - EMN, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Stephanie StielInstitute for General Practice, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne challenge in caring for cancer patients with incurable disease is the adequate identification of those in need for specialized palliative care (SPC). The study's aim was to validate an easy to use phenomenological screening tool.

methodsThe German tool is based on the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Palliative Care guidelines and contains ten items in five domains that focus e.g. on diagnosis, functional status, complications, comorbidities, and palliative care relevant problems such as symptom management, distress, and support of family and team members. Sum score ranges from 0 to 14 (no need to great need). Assessment to identify SPC needs was done in university hospital wards between 1 and 08/2017 by health care professionals on admission of the patient if the disease was incurable and expected prognosis < 12 months. The Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale (IPOS, staff version), an outcome assessment instrument for palliative care that consists of ten items, served as external criterion; in sub samples inter-rater/test-retest were performed.

resultsData from 208 patients with incurable disease and life expectancy < 12 months (54.8% female; average age 63.5 years, range 21-96) were assessed using the tool. The tool has good convergent validity; the correlation between the sum scores of IPOS and our tool showed a significant and substantial effect. The sum score was independent of the patient's age, gender and primary diagnosis. Patients who already were in contact with SPC had significantly higher screening scores than patients without. With a cut point of  ≥ 5, 80.8% of the screened patients were in need for SPC. Cronbach's alpha was α = .600. Rater agreement (inter-rater, test-retest) varied between single items. Correlation coefficients showed significant substantial effects.

conclusionsThis is the first validation of a screening procedure in German language identifying SPC needs of adult patients with advanced cancer and the first using filter questions as a pre-screening. Proxy assessment of SPC needs by physicians in cancer care settings is feasible and the suggested tool presents a valid instrument to trigger a PC consultation.

trial registrationThe study was not registered.

Indexed as

Needs AssessmentPalliative CareAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsOutcome Assessment, Health CareReproducibility of ResultsYoung AdultCancerDelivery of health careNeeds assessmentPalliative carePsychometric properties

Identifiers

PMID31262285
PMCPMC6604384
OpenAlexW2955258258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.