Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31262274›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2019

Development of an environmental health tool linking chemical exposures, physical location and lung function.

Diana Rohlman, Holly M Dixon, Laurel Kincl, Andrew Larkin, Richard Evoy, Michael Barton, Aaron Phillips, Elena Peterson, Christopher Scaffidi, Julie B Herbstman and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Characterizing variability in personal chemical exposure to improve exposomics.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. PMGeoHealth · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Silicone Wristbands in Exposure Assessment: Analytical Considerations and Comparison with Other Approaches.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Diana RohlmanCollege of Public Health and Human Sciences; Superfund Research Program, Oregon State University, 101 Milam Hall, Corvallis, Oregon, USA. diana.rohlman@oregonstate.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3982-0327
Holly M DixonEnvironmental and Molecular Toxicology, Food Safety and Environmental Stewardship Program, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
Laurel KinclCollege of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
Andrew LarkinCollege of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
Richard EvoyCollege of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
Michael BartonSuperfund Research Program, Food Safety and Environmental Stewardship Program, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
Aaron PhillipsComputing & Analytics Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA.
Elena PetersonComputing & Analytics Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington, USA.
Christopher ScaffidiCollege of Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
Julie B HerbstmanEnvironmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York City, USA.
Katrina M WatersBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.
Kim A AndersonEnvironmental and Molecular Toxicology, Food Safety and Environmental Stewardship Program, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.

Funding

True Metal fac coreP30ES009089 · NIEHS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MATTHEW S PERZANOWSKI · 1998 to 2026
$44.7M
REPRODUCTIVE AND DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICOLOGY RESEARCHP30ES006096 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI PINNEY, SUSAN MENGEL · 1992 to 2022
$35.4M
Reducing Susceptibility to Environmental Stress Throughout the Life SpanP30ES000210 · NIEHS · OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BECKMAN, JOSEPH S · 1985 to 2015
$21.4M
MODE OF ACTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICANTST32ES007060 · NIEHS · OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Jamie DeWitt, Siva Kumar Kolluri · 1985 to 2026
$11.6M
Personal Envl Exposure Assmt using Wristbands for Epi Studies in Disadv CommR33ES024718 · NIEHS · OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ANDERSON, KIM A., HERBSTMAN, JULIE BETH · 2016 to 2019
$2.3M
Personal Environmental Exposure Assessment using Wristbands for Epidemiological Studies in Disadvantaged CommunitiesR21ES024718 · NIEHS · OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ANDERSON, KIM A., HERBSTMAN, JULIE BETH · 2015 to 2015
$265k
NIEHS NIH HHS P30ES000210NIEHS NIH HHS P30ES006096NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES009089NIEHS NIH HHS R21ES024718NIEHS NIH HHS R33 ES024718NIEHS NIH HHS R33ES024718NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES007060NIEHS NIH HHS T32ES007060
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA challenge in environmental health research is collecting robust data sets to facilitate comparisons between personal chemical exposures, the environment and health outcomes. To address this challenge, the Exposure, Location and lung Function (ELF) tool was designed in collaboration with communities that share environmental health concerns. These concerns centered on respiratory health and ambient air quality. The ELF collects exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), given their association with diminished lung function. Here, we describe the ELF as a novel environmental health assessment tool.

methodsThe ELF tool collects chemical exposure for 62 PAHs using passive sampling silicone wristbands, geospatial location data and respiratory lung function measures using a paired hand-held spirometer. The ELF was tested by 10 individuals with mild to moderate asthma for 7 days. Participants wore a wristband each day to collect PAH exposure, carried a cell phone, and performed spirometry daily to collect respiratory health measures. Location data was gathered using the geospatial positioning system technology in an Android cell-phone.

resultsWe detected and quantified 31 PAHs across the study population. PAH exposure data showed spatial and temporal sensitivity within and between participants. Location data was used with existing datasets such as the Toxics Release Inventory and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Hazard Mapping System. Respiratory health outcomes were validated using criteria from the American Thoracic Society with 94% of participant data meeting standards. Finally, the ELF was used with a high degree of compliance (> 90%) by community members.

conclusionsThe ELF is a novel environmental health assessment tool that allows for personal data collection spanning chemical exposures, location and lung function measures as well as self-reported information.

Indexed as

AdultData CollectionEnvironmental ExposureEnvironmental HealthFemaleGeographic Information SystemsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsRespiratory Physiological PhenomenaPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsAir qualityAsthmaEnvironmental healthExposomePAHsSilicone wristbandsSpirometerWearable sensors

Identifiers

PMID31262274
PMCPMC6604385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.