Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31261862›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Perceptions of Nature and Access to Green Space in Four Urban Neighborhoods.

Justine S Sefcik, Michelle C Kondo, Heather Klusaritz, Elisa Sarantschin, Sara Solomon, Abbey Roepke, Eugenia C South, Sara F Jacoby

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Investigation of Epistemic Equity in Urban Green Space and Mental Health Research: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Justine S SefcikSchool of Nursing, the University of Pennsylvania, Claire M. Fagin Hall, 418 Curie Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. jsefcik@nursing.upenn.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1691-7836
Michelle C KondoNorthern Research Station, USDA Forest Service, 100 N. 20th St, Ste 205, Philadelphia, PA 19103, USA.
Heather KlusaritzDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, the Perelman School of Medicine, the University of Pennsylvania, 3737 Market St 9th Fl., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Elisa SarantschinNaturePHL Program, Department of Education, Schuylkill Center for Environmental Education, 8480 Hagys Mill Rd, Philadelphia, PA 19128, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4533-2730
Sara SolomonPenn Injury Science Center, Perelman School of Medicine, the University of Pennsylvania, 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Abbey RoepkeCenter for Public Health Initiatives, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3620 Hamilton Walk, Anatomy Chemistry Rm 141, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Eugenia C SouthDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, the University of Pennsylvania, Blockley Hall 408, 423 Guardian Dr, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Sara F JacobyDepartment of Family and Community Health, School of Nursing, the University of Pennsylvania, Claire M. Fagin Hall, room 412, 418 Curie Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

Funding

Individualized Care for At Risk Older AdultsT32NR009356 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Lauren M Massimo, MARY D NAYLOR · 2007 to 2026
$7.8M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health benefits have been linked to spending time outdoors in nature and green space. However, there is some evidence of inequities to accessing safe outdoor space, particularly in low-resource communities. The primary aim of this study is to assess attitudes towards nature and use of green space in urban areas. A secondary aim is to describe perceptions of physician-initiated nature prescriptions that target local pediatric populations. We conducted six focus group interviews with 42 residents who were guardians or caretakers of children living in low-resource neighborhoods in Philadelphia, PA. We analyzed interview data using a conventional content analysis approach. Three major themes emerged: (1) perceived benefits of being in nature (physical and mental health benefits), (2) barriers to time spent in nature (unsafe and undesirable conditions of local parks), and (3) desired features of outdoor green spaces (amenities that would increase park use). Additionally, we describe participants' reactions to the idea of a pediatrician-delivered prescription for outdoor green space exposure for a child in their care. Adherence to nature prescriptions programs may hinge on local green space resources, as well as experiential and perceptual barriers and facilitators to nature and park accessibility among caregivers tasked with fulfilling a nature prescription for a child in their care.

Indexed as

Parks, RecreationalResidence CharacteristicsAdolescentAdultAgedAttitudeExerciseFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedPhiladelphiaUrban PopulationYoung Adultfocus groupsgreen spacelow-resource neighborhoodsnature

Identifiers

PMID31261862
PMCPMC6651051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.