Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31261769›Full record

ReviewGenes2019

Cloudy with a Chance of Insights: Context Dependent Gene Regulation and Implications for Evolutionary Studies.

Elisa Buchberger, Micael Reis, Ting-Hsuan Lu, Nico Posnien

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. ATAC-seq in Emerging Model Organisms: Challenges and Strategies.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Unraveling patterns of disrupted gene expression across a complex tissue.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Evolved Differences inGenetics · 2020
    Article
  20. Sex differences in spiders: from phenotype to genomics.Development genes and evolution · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elisa BuchbergerUniversity Göttingen, Göttingen Center for Molecular Biosciences (GZMB), Dpt. of Developmental Biology, Justus-von-Liebig-Weg 11, 37077 Göttingen, Germany. ebuchbe@gwdg.de.
Micael ReisUniversity Göttingen, Göttingen Center for Molecular Biosciences (GZMB), Dpt. of Developmental Biology, Justus-von-Liebig-Weg 11, 37077 Göttingen, Germany. mreis@gwdg.de.
Ting-Hsuan LuUniversity Göttingen, Göttingen Center for Molecular Biosciences (GZMB), Dpt. of Developmental Biology, Justus-von-Liebig-Weg 11, 37077 Göttingen, Germany. tlu@gwdg.de.
Nico PosnienUniversity Göttingen, Göttingen Center for Molecular Biosciences (GZMB), Dpt. of Developmental Biology, Justus-von-Liebig-Weg 11, 37077 Göttingen, Germany. nposnie@gwdg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research in various fields of evolutionary biology has shown that divergence in gene expression is a key driver for phenotypic evolution. An exceptional contribution of

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGene Expression RegulationAllelesChromatinGene ExpressionGene Expression ProfilingGenotypeMethylationPhenotypeQuantitative Trait LociRNA Processing, Post-TranscriptionalTranscription FactorsChromatinTranscription Factorsallele specific expressionAssay for Transposase-Accessible Chromatin using sequencing (ATACseq)ChIPseqchromatinevolutionexpression quantitative trait loci (eQTL)gene expressiongene regulationgenotype–phenotype mapRNAseq

Identifiers

PMID31261769
PMCPMC6678813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.