Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31261573›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2019

Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio predicts the outcome of intracerebral hemorrhage: A meta-analysis.

Shuo Liu, Xiaoqiang Liu, Shuying Chen, Yingxiu Xiao, Weiduan Zhuang

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Lipoxin ABrain sciences · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Systematic Understanding of Mechanism of Yi-Qi-Huo-Xue Decoction Against Intracerebral Hemorrhagic Stroke Using a Network Pharmacology Approach.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2020
    Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shuo LiuNeurology Department, First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, Guangdong, China.
Xiaoqiang Liu
Shuying Chen
Yingxiu Xiao
Weiduan Zhuang
Shantou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is increasingly recognized as a systemic inflammation factor. It has been used as a predictor for clinical outcomes in cancers. However, its relationship with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is still disputed. We sought to evaluate the prognostic role of NLR in ICH.

methodsWe searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Medline, and EMBASE for potentially relevant articles from inception to April 8, 2018. Efficacy outcomes included major disability at 90 days, short-term mortality or in-hospital mortality. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were pooled to assess the association between NLR and ICH.

resultsA total of 7 trials with 2176 patients were included in this meta-analysis. It revealed that higher NLR had a higher risk of major disability at 90 days (OR: 2.20; 95% CI: 1.27-3.81) and higher mortality at short-term (OR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.02-1.68) in ICH; without statistically significant association with in-hospital mortality (OR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.91-1.15).

conclusionsOur meta-analysis proved that high NLR was a predictor of major disability and mortality at short term in ICH patients, but not a predictor of in-hospital mortality.

Indexed as

LymphocytesNeutrophilsCerebral HemorrhageHumansLeukocyte CountPredictive Value of TestsPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID31261573
PMCPMC6617425
OpenAlexW2954516011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.