Observational studyMedicine2019
Effect of paternal age on intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes in cryptozoospermic men: Ejaculated or testicular sperm?
Observational study in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- In Vitro Fertilisation and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection predictive factors: A review of the effect of female age, ovarian reserve, male age, and male factor on IVF/ICSI treatment outcomes.JBRA assisted reproduction · 2023Review
- Association of ABO blood groups with ovarian reserve: a retrospective cohort study in Chinese Han women younger than 40 years with infertility.Journal of ovarian research · 2022Article
- Article
- Extended indications for sperm retrieval: summary of current literature.F1000Research · 2019Review
- ICSI with Testicular Sperm in Non-Azoospermic Men: Expert Opinion and Practical Algorithm.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of UrologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is not clear whether age has any influence on the outcomes for sperm used for assisted reproductive technology in cryptozoospermic men. We evaluated intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) outcomes using ejaculated or testicular sperm in men with cryptozoospermia from different paternal age ranges.We conducted a retrospective observational study of 35 men with cryptozoospermia who underwent ICSI from 2010 to 2018. They were classified into 2 groups based on male age, namely < 35 years and ≥ 35 years. Each group was further divided into 2 subgroups according to the origin of sperm (ejaculated or testicular).In the <35 years group, the normal fertilization and high-quality embryo rates for ejaculated sperm were significantly higher than with testicular sperm (74.7% vs. 62.4%, P = .02; 50.5% vs. 36.6%, P = .03, respectively). However, in the ≥35 years group, the high-quality embryo and clinical pregnancy rates were significantly lower in the ejaculated sperm subgroup than in the testicular sperm subgroup (26.2% vs. 63%, P = .002; 12.5% vs. 71.4%, P = .04, respectively).This study indicates that ICSI should be performed as soon as possible for men with cryptozoospermia. When the paternal age ≥35 years, testicular sperm should be used for ICSI, as this offers better high-quality embryo and clinical pregnancy rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.