ArticleMedicine2019
Delayed endoscopic removal of sharp foreign body in the esophagus increased clinical complications: An experience from multiple centers in China.
Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Conservative management of oesophageal soft food bolus impaction.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Management of patients who ingest razor blades: a singlecenter experience.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2026Article
- CT-Negative Fish Bone Impaction in the Pyriform Sinus Requiring Operative Removal: A Case Report.Cureus · 2026Article
- Foreign body ingestion in adults: a retrospective cohort study of clinical characteristics and Endoscopic outcomes.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Esophagus Impaction and Perforation by Jujube: A Tale of Double Trouble.Middle East journal of digestive diseases · 2025Article
- Esophageal foreign bodies: a retrospective analysis of 275 cases.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Adherence to therapeutic gastroscopy guidelines for acute esophageal food bolus impaction: Impact on adverse outcomes and length of stay.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2024Article
- Predicting Factors of Clinical Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized after Esophageal Foreign Body or Caustic Injuries: The Experience of a Tertiary Center.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Esophageal foreign body removal under holmium laser-assisted gastroscope: A case report.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Article
- Emergency Removal of Ingested Foreign Bodies in 586 Adults at a Single Hospital in China According to the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Recommendations: A 10-Year Retrospective Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2022Article
- Individualized endoscopic management strategy for impacting jujube pits in the upper gastrointestinal tract: a 3-year single-center experience in northern China.BMC surgery · 2021Article
- Endoscopic Image-guided treatment of Upper Gastrointestinal foreign body and nursing care of complications.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2021Article
- Increase in foreign body and harmful substance ingestion and associated complications in children: a retrospective study of 1199 cases from 2005 to 2017.BMC pediatrics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Foreign bodies impaction in the esophagus is a common clinical emergency. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical features of foreign body ingestion, and to analyze the risk factors of complications during the endoscopic procedure.From 18 general hospitals in Zhejiang Province in China, 595 patients who underwent gastroscopic removal of ingested foreign bodies were prospectively recruited. Patient characteristics, clinical features, foreign body features, clinical outcomes, and complications were documented.The most common types of foreign body in the esophagus were sharp objects (75.9%), including fish bones (34.0%), chicken bones (22.1%), and fruit nuclei (17.1%). The remaining types were non-sharp objects (24.1%), including food bolus (14.6%). Most objects were lodged in the proximal esophagus (75.9%). Foreign body-related complications occurred in 63 patients (10.5%), including hemorrhage (5.0%), perforation and infection (5.5%). The complication rate was increased by 4.04- and 8.48- fold when endoscopic retrieval was performed after impacted for over 24 and 48 hours, respectively, after impaction, as compared with within 12 hours. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the patients with sharp objects developed more complications than those with non-sharp ones (odds ratio, 2.85; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-7.50; P = .034). However, complications were unrelated with the location in the esophagus or length of foreign bodies (P > .05).Sharp objects were the most frequently ingested foreign bodies in the esophagus in China. The prevalence of complications was increased in the patients with long foreign body retention time (>24 hours) and sharp objects. Sharp foreign bodies in the esophagus are recommended to be removed within 24 hours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.