Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31261529›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2019

Comparison of the aperture and midportion femoral tunnel widening after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analyses.

Haluk Celik, Dae-Hee Lee

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Haluk CelikDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Dae-Hee LeeDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo identify whether the aperture or the midportion of the femoral tunnel had a larger tunnel widening in patients who undergo ACL reconstruction.

methodsPubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were searched for relative studies that evaluated tunnel widening in patients underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction. Two reviewers independently recorded data from each study, including the sample size and magnitude of tunnel widening. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to pool the outcomes of tunnel widening by estimating the standardized mean differences in tunnel widening and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs), Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots and Egger test when the number of included studies was >10.

resultsEleven included studies compared tunnel widening between the aperture and the midportion. In these studies, 372 and 92 patients underwent single- and double-bundle ACL reconstructions, respectively. Subgroup analyses in terms of evaluation imaging tool for tunnel widening showed no significant differences in tunnel widening between the aperture and the midportion of the femoral tunnel regardless of plain radiograph (mean difference, 0.02 mm; P = .97), computed tomography (mean difference 0.08 mm; P = .55), and magnetic resonance imaging (mean difference, 0.13 mm; P = .78). Likewise, no significant difference in femoral tunnel widening was found between the aperture and the midportion, irrespective of transtibial (mean difference, 0.18 mm; P = .57), anteromedial (mean difference, 0.02 mm; P = .90), and outside-in techniques (mean difference, 0.01 mm; P = .98).

conclusionNo significant difference in femoral tunnel widening was found between the aperture and the midportion in the patients who underwent ACL reconstruction.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionFemurHumansPostoperative Complications

Identifiers

PMID31261529
PMCPMC6616244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.