ArticleMedicine2019
Role of ascitic prostaglandin E2 in diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and prediction of in-hospital mortality in patients with decompensated cirrhosis.
Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is one of the most frequent and severe complications in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. Early antibiotic therapy is extremely important for successful treatment and reducing mortality. Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) is a regulator of the immune response and infection. This study aimed to explore whether ascitic PGE2 could be used as a marker for diagnosing SBP and predicting in-hospital mortality.Patients with cirrhosis and ascites undergoing abdominal paracentesis were enrolled in our study. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory parameters were recorded at the time of paracentesis and ascitic PGE2 levels were determined by ELISA. The correlation between ascitic PGE2 level and SBP as well as in-hospital mortality were analyzed.There were 224 patients enrolled, 29 (13%) patients diagnosed as SBP based on the current guideline criteria. The ascitic PGE2 level of patients with SBP [32.77 (26.5-39.68) pg/mL] was significantly lower than that of patients without SBP [49.72 (37.35-54.72) pg/mL]. In ROC analysis, the AUC of ascitic PGE2 for the diagnosis of SBP was 0.75, and the AUC of ascitic PGE2 combined with WBC and ascitic PGE2 combined with neutrophils were 0.90 and 0.90, respectively, which were significantly higher than that of ascitic PGE2. In multivariate analysis, ascites PGE2≤32.88 pg/mL (OR: 9.39; 95% CI: 1.41-67.44, P = .026), hepatic encephalopathy (OR: 18.39; 95% CI: 3.00-113.13, P = .002) and a higher MELD score (OR: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.05-1.40, P = .009) remained independent predictors of in-hospital mortality.Ascitic PGE2 level is likely to be a valuable marker in prediction of in-hospital mortality in patients with decompensated cirrhosis, and its value in diagnosis of SBP was not superior to other inflammatory indicators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.