Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31261494›Full record

Trial reportMedicine2019

Long-term treatment with eteplirsen in nonambulatory patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

Lindsay N Alfano, Jay S Charleston, Anne M Connolly, Linda Cripe, Cas Donoghue, Robert Dracker, Johannes Dworzak, Helen Eliopoulos, Diane E Frank, Sarah Lewis and 11 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05753462 (Phase 1/2a, Monocentric, Open Label Study to Evaluate the Safety, PK and PD of SQY51 in Paediatric and Adult Patients With a Genetically Confirmed Diagnosis of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy), which is not on this map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05753462 phase1 / phase2unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Phase 1/2a, Monocentric, Open Label Study to Evaluate the Safety, PK and PD of SQY51 in Paediatric and Adult Patients With a Genetically Confirmed Diagnosis of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

TypeinterventionalSponsorSqy TherapeuticsRan2023 to 2025Enrolled12ConditionsDuchenne Muscular DystrophyArmsPhase 1, SQY51, Phase 2a, SQY51 (cohort 1), Phase 2a, SQY51 (cohort 2), Phase 2a, SQY51 (cohort 3)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Transition and management of patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: a narrative review based on Italian experts' opinion and real-world experience.Acta myologica : myopathies and cardiomyopathies : official journal of the Mediterranean Society of Myology · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Evolving Therapeutic Options for the Treatment of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. [Research advances in pharmacotherapy for rare diseases in children].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2023
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lindsay N AlfanoPediatrics, Center for Gene Therapy, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH.
Jay S CharlestonSarepta Therapeutics, Inc., Cambridge, MA.
Anne M ConnollyCurrently: Pediatrics, Center for Gene Therapy, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH.
Linda CripePediatrics, Center for Gene Therapy, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH.
Cas DonoghueSarepta Therapeutics, Inc., Cambridge, MA.
Robert DrackerSummerwood Pediatrics/Infusacare Medical Services, PC, Liverpool, NY.
Johannes DworzakSarepta Therapeutics, Inc., Cambridge, MA.
Helen EliopoulosSarepta Therapeutics, Inc., Cambridge, MA.
Diane E FrankSarepta Therapeutics, Inc., Cambridge, MA.
Sarah LewisPediatrics, Center for Gene Therapy, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH.
Karin LucasSarepta Therapeutics, Inc., Cambridge, MA.
Jessie LynchSarepta Therapeutics, Inc., Cambridge, MA.
A J MiliciFlagship Biosciences, Westminster, CO.
Amy FlyntPharPoint Research, Durham, NC.
Emily NaughtonSarepta Therapeutics, Inc., Cambridge, MA.
Louise R Rodino-KlapacPediatrics, Center for Gene Therapy, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH.
Zarife SahenkPediatrics, Center for Gene Therapy, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH.
Frederick J SchnellSarepta Therapeutics, Inc., Cambridge, MA.
G David YoungFlagship Biosciences, Westminster, CO.
Jerry R MendellPediatrics, Center for Gene Therapy, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH.
Linda P LowesPediatrics, Center for Gene Therapy, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH.
Sarepta Therapeutics (United States) · USNationwide Children's Hospital · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This analysis aims to describe the outcomes of two nonambulatory patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) who participated in two clinical studies. The two consecutive trials of eteplirsen (studies 201 and 202) were conducted in patients with DMD (N = 12) and confirmed genetic mutations amenable to exon 51 skipping.In study 201, 12 patients were randomized to receive once-weekly, double-blind intravenous infusions of eteplirsen 30 or 50 mg/kg or placebo for 24 weeks; patients then received open-label eteplirsen during weeks 25 through 28. All 12 patients continued onto open-label extension study 202 and received long-term treatment with eteplirsen. We compared cardiac, pulmonary, and upper limb function and dystrophin production in the nonambulatory twin patients versus the 10 ambulatory patients through 240 combined treatment weeks.Ten study patients remained ambulatory through both studies, while the identical twin patients both experienced early, rapid loss of ambulation. The twin patients had greater disease severity at baseline (6-minute walk test [6MWT], 330 and 256 m) versus the other patients (n = 10; 6MWT range, 341-418 m). They maintained cardiac and upper limb function through combined week 240, with outcomes similar to those of the patients who remained ambulatory. Dystrophin production was confirmed following eteplirsen treatment.Despite the loss of ambulation, other markers of disease progression remained relatively stable in the eteplirsen-treated twin patients and were similar to those of the ambulatory patients.

Indexed as

ChildDisease ProgressionDiseases in TwinsDouble-Blind MethodDystrophinHumansMaleMorpholinosMuscular Dystrophy, DuchenneRNA Processing, Post-TranscriptionalSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeWalkingWalk TestDMD protein, humanDystrophineteplirsenMorpholinos

Identifiers

PMID31261494
PMCPMC6617421
OpenAlexW2954082563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.