ArticleEar and hearing
The Association Between Physiological Noise Levels and Speech Understanding in Noise.
Article in Ear and hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Occupational Hearing Loss in the Intensive Care Unit: A Comparative Study Between ICU and Non-ICU Nursing Staff.Nursing in critical care · 2026Article
- The Ins and Outs of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission Growth: A Review.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2025Review
- Multidimensional relationships between sensory perception and cognitive aging.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2024Article
- A Variable-Stimulus Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission Screening Method to Match Cochlear Place-Specific Properties.Ear and hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTraditionally, elevated hearing thresholds have been considered to be the main contributors to difficulty understanding speech in noise; yet, patients will often report difficulties with speech understanding in noise despite having audiometrically normal hearing. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to critically evaluate the relationship of various metrics of auditory function (behavioral thresholds and otoacoustic emissions) on speech understanding in noise in a large sample of audiometrically normal-hearing individuals.
designBehavioral hearing thresholds, distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) levels, stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission levels, and physiological noise (quantified using OAE noise floors) were measured from 921 individuals between 10 and 68 years of age with normal pure-tone averages. The quick speech-in-noise (QuickSIN) test outcome, quantified as the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) loss, was used as the metric of speech understanding in noise. Principle component analysis (PCA) and linear regression modeling were used to evaluate the relationship between the measures of auditory function and speech in noise performance.
resultsOver 25% of participants exhibited mild or worse degree of SNR loss. PCA revealed DPOAE levels at 12.5 to 16 kHz to be significantly correlated with the variation in QuickSIN scores, although correlations were weak (R = 0.017). Out of all the metrics evaluated, higher levels of self-generated physiological noise accounted for the most variance in QuickSIN performance (R = 0.077).
conclusionsHigher levels of physiological noise were associated with worse QuickSIN performance in listeners with normal hearing sensitivity. We propose that elevated physiological noise levels in poorer speech in noise performers could diminish the effective SNR, thereby negatively impacting performance as seen by poorer QuickSIN scores.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.