Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31260816›Full record

SynthesisClinical psychology review2019

Social reactions to disclosure of interpersonal violence and psychopathology: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Emily R Dworkin, Charlotte D Brill, Sarah E Ullman

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical psychology review, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A Systematic Review of Trauma Disclosure Behaviors to Informal Support Sources.Clinical psychology : a publication of the Division of Clinical Psychology of the American Psychological Association · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emily R DworkinUniversity of Washington School of Medicine, 1100 NE 45(th) St., Ste. 300, Seattle, WA 98105, USA. Electronic address: edworkin@uw.edu.
Charlotte D BrillUniversity of Washington, 119A Guthrie Hall Box 351525, Seattle, WA 98195-1525, USA. Electronic address: charlotte.brill@va.gov.
Sarah E UllmanUniversity of Illinois, Chicago, 1007 West Harrison Street (MC 141), 4050B Behavioral Sciences Building, Chicago, IL 60607-7140, USA. Electronic address: seullman@uic.edu.

Funding

Psychology Training in Alcohol Research (PTAR)T32AA007455 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MARY E. LARIMER · 1985 to 2026
$11.4M
Engaging Social Support to Prevent High-Risk Drinking and Posttraumatic Stress After Sexual Assault: Developing and Testing a Web-Based InterventionK99AA026317 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DWORKIN, EMILY RAPHAEL · 2018 to 2018
$121k
NIAAA NIH HHS K99 AA026317NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA007455
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Public attention has been increasingly paid to how friends, family members, and others can best support survivors of sexual assault and other forms of violence. The broader social support literature posits that perceiving social support positively is more important to mental health than the degree to which social support is actually received, and that negative interactions with social supporters are more harmful than positive interactions are helpful (potentially because negative reactions violate survivors' expectations of their social supporters). This may be especially true after a crisis, such as interpersonal violence. Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis summarizes the literature on social reactions to interpersonal violence. Meta-regression analyses were performed on 1871 correlations from 51 studies reflecting the degree to which receiving specific reactions more frequently, or perceiving reactions more positively, was associated with psychopathology. Results indicated that negative social reactions to disclosure-especially reactions involving controlling, distracting, and treating survivors differently-were associated with worse psychopathology, whereas positive social reactions did not appear to be protective. Perceiving reactions more positively was associated with less severe psychopathology, but (although causation cannot be concluded) positive perceptions' potential benefit appeared to be smaller than the potential risk conveyed by negative reactions. These findings indicate that interventions which reduce the degree to which survivors receive negative social reactions are needed.

Indexed as

DisclosureInterpersonal RelationsMental DisordersSocial SupportViolenceHumansCrisis supportIntimate partner violenceRapeSocial supportTrauma

Identifiers

PMID31260816
PMCPMC6716998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.