Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31260690›Full record

ReviewJournal of molecular biology2019

Distinct Genome Replication and Transcription Strategies within the Growing Filovirus Family.

Adam J Hume, Elke Mühlberger

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of molecular biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Marburg Virus Minigenome Assays.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adam J HumeDepartment of Microbiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118, USA; National Emerging Infectious Diseases Laboratories, Boston University, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
Elke MühlbergerDepartment of Microbiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118, USA; National Emerging Infectious Diseases Laboratories, Boston University, Boston, MA 02118, USA. Electronic address: muehlber@bu.edu.
Boston University · US

Funding

Regulatory Compliance CoreUC7AI095321 · NIAID · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI ROBERT A DAVEY · 2014 to 2026
$159.3M
Mechanisms of Marburg virus gene expressionR01AI133486 · NIAID · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI FEARNS, RACHEL, MUHLBERGER, ELKE C · 2018 to 2022
$2.7M
Deciphering the pathogenic potential of Lloviu virus, a novel filovirusR21AI137793 · NIAID · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI MUHLBERGER, ELKE C · 2018 to 2019
$453k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI133486NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI137793NIAID NIH HHS UC7 AI095321
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research on filoviruses has historically focused on the highly pathogenic ebola- and marburgviruses. Indeed, until recently, these were the only two genera in the filovirus family. Recent advances in sequencing technologies have facilitated the discovery of not only a new ebolavirus, but also three new filovirus genera and a sixth proposed genus. While two of these new genera are similar to the ebola- and marburgviruses, the other two, discovered in saltwater fishes, are considerably more diverse. Nonetheless, these viruses retain a number of key features of the other filoviruses. Here, we review the key characteristics of filovirus replication and transcription, highlighting similarities and differences between the viruses. In particular, we focus on key regulatory elements in the genomes, replication and transcription strategies, and the conservation of protein domains and functions among the viruses. In addition, using computational analyses, we were able to identify potential homology and functions for some of the genes of the novel filoviruses with previously unknown functions. Although none of the newly discovered filoviruses have yet been isolated, initial studies of some of these viruses using minigenome systems have yielded insights into their mechanisms of replication and transcription. In general, the Cuevavirus and proposed Dianlovirus genera appear to follow the transcription and replication strategies employed by the ebola- and marburgviruses, respectively. While our knowledge of the fish filoviruses is currently limited to sequence analysis, the lack of certain conserved motifs and even entire genes necessitates that they have evolved distinct mechanisms of replication and transcription.

Indexed as

FiloviridaeGenome, ViralRegulatory Elements, TranscriptionalVirus ReplicationEbola virusfilovirusesgenome replication and transcriptionMarburg virusnonsegmented negative sense RNA viruses

Identifiers

PMID31260690
PMCPMC6879820
OpenAlexW2955897565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.