Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31260529›Full record

ArticleJournal of insect science (Online)2019

Artificial Corn-Based Diet for Rearing Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).

José Ricardo Lima Pinto, Aline Finotti Torres, Caio Cesar Truzi, Natalia Fernanda Vieira, Alessandra Marieli Vacari, Sergio Antonio De Bortoli

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of insect science (Online), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Microorganisms · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. DisruptingFrontiers in physiology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Reproductive potential of fall armywormFrontiers in insect science · 2022
    Article
  17. Chitinase (CHI) ofFrontiers in physiology · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

José Ricardo Lima PintoDepartment of Crop Protection, São Paulo State University Unesp, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.
Aline Finotti TorresDepartment of Crop Protection, São Paulo State University Unesp, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.
Caio Cesar TruziDepartment of Crop Protection, São Paulo State University Unesp, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.
Natalia Fernanda VieiraDepartment of Crop Protection, São Paulo State University Unesp, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.
Alessandra Marieli VacariAgricultural Entomology Laboratory, Animal Science Graduate Program, University of Franca, Franca, São Paulo, Brazil.
Sergio Antonio De BortoliDepartment of Crop Protection, São Paulo State University Unesp, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith, 1797) is considered a key pest of maize. However, the artificial diets used for rearing this insect in the laboratory do not contain corn. The aim of this study was to evaluate the biology and to compare the food consumption by S. frugiperda, as well as the food preference of the larvae in the standard diet and the corn-based diet. Three of the following diets were evaluated: a standard diet based on beans (D1), a diet with corn flour as substitute for wheat germ (D2), and a diet replacing beans with green corn (D3). The biological parameters evaluated were period and survival of larvae and pupae; weight of male and female pupae; sex ratio; fecundity; egg incubation period; and adult longevity. The nutritional indices were determined and the biological data obtained were used to determine the parameters of fertility life tables; we also performed a multiple-choice test (feeding test). Larval development of S. frugiperda occurred in all three diets, although without oviposition by females developed from larval fed on D2. There was no difference among the diets in relation to the fertility life table parameters. The diet D2 resulted in better ingestion, digestion, assimilation, and conversion of food, but was associated with a metabolic cost to assimilate the food. Using a multiple-choice test, we observed that the larvae preferred diet D2. Based on our results, the most adequate diets for rearing S. frugiperda in the laboratory are D1 and D3.

Indexed as

DietZea maysAnimalsLarvaSpodopterafertility life tableinsect biologymass rearingnutrition

Identifiers

PMID31260529
PMCPMC6601867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.