Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31260437›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2019

Biomechanical Effects of Fixation of Different Segments of Goat Lumbar Spine on Adjacent Segmental Motion and Intradiscal Pressure Change.

Xiaoping Mu, Zhuhai Li, Dong Yin, Bin Liang, Yufu Ou, Jianxun Wei

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiaoping MuDepartment of Orthopedics, People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, Guangxi, China (mainland).
Zhuhai LiDepartment of Orthopedics, People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, Guangxi, China (mainland).
Dong YinDepartment of Orthopedics, People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, Guangxi, China (mainland).
Bin LiangDepartment of Orthopedics, People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, Guangxi, China (mainland).
Yufu OuDepartment of Orthopedics, People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, Guangxi, China (mainland).
Jianxun WeiDepartment of Orthopedics, People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, Guangxi, China (mainland).
The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to investigate the biomechanical fixation effects of different segments of the goat spine on adjacent segmental motion and intradiscal pressure (IDP) change. MATERIAL AND METHODS Eighteen goat spine specimens were randomly divided into 3 groups: group A (single-segment fixation), group B (double-segment fixation), and group C (triple-segment fixation). The motion was tested on each specimen using a spinal motion simulation test system with rational pressure loading. The IDP was measured using a pinhole pressure sensor. RESULTS Range of motion (ROM) and IDP of adjacent segments increased with increased external load. In comparison of the 3 groups, significant differences in ROM were found when the external force was more than 100 N (P<0.05). The differences in IDP of the adjacent segment were statistically significant (P<0.05) when external pressure was greater than or equal to 60 N. However, in comparison of group A with group B, no significant differences in ROM and IDP of the adjacent segments were noted for the motions of anterior flexion, posterior extension, and lateral bending (P>0.05). Moreover, upper adjacent segments had greater ROM than the lower adjacent segments (P<0.05). We found significant differences between IDPs of the upper adjacent segments and lower adjacent segments (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS As the number of fixated lumbar segments increases, ROM and IDP of the adjacent segments increase. Multisegment fixation is most likely the main factor contributing to the development of adjacent segmental lesions after lumbar fixation.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaGoatsIntervertebral DiscLumbar VertebraeLumbosacral RegionPressureRange of Motion, ArticularRotationSpinal Fusion

Identifiers

PMID31260437
PMCPMC6615077
OpenAlexW2953868662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.