Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31260395›Full record

ArticleJournal of global oncology2019

Overcoming Barriers in the Implementation of Programs for Breast and Cervical Cancers in Cali, Colombia: A Pilot Model.

Armando Sardi, Mavalynne Orozco-Urdaneta, Carolina Velez-Mejia, Andres H Perez-Bustos, Carlos Munoz-Zuluaga, Farah El-Sharkawy, Luis Gabriel Parra-Lara, Patricia Córdoba, David Gallo, Michelle Sittig and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of global oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Healthcare stakeholders' perspectives on coordinating cancer diagnosis in Chile, Colombia, and Ecuador.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Coordination Models for Cancer Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Armando SardiInstitute for Cancer Care, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD.
Mavalynne Orozco-UrdanetaPartners for Cancer Care and Prevention, Baltimore, MD.
Carolina Velez-MejiaInstitute for Cancer Care, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD.
Andres H Perez-BustosFundación para la Prevención y Tratamiento del Cáncer, Cali, Colombia.
Carlos Munoz-ZuluagaInstitute for Cancer Care, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD.
Farah El-SharkawyPartners for Cancer Care and Prevention, Baltimore, MD.
Luis Gabriel Parra-LaraFundación para la Prevención y Tratamiento del Cáncer, Cali, Colombia.
Patricia CórdobaFundación para la Prevención y Tratamiento del Cáncer, Cali, Colombia.
David GalloFundación para la Prevención y Tratamiento del Cáncer, Cali, Colombia.
Michelle SittigInstitute for Cancer Care, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD.
Mary Caitlin KingInstitute for Cancer Care, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD.
Carol NierodaInstitute for Cancer Care, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD.
Katherin Zambrano-VeraInstitute for Cancer Care, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD.
John SingerPartners for Cancer Care and Prevention, Baltimore, MD.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast and cervical cancers are leading causes of mortality among women in Latin America. Colombia has universal health care and a government-sponsored 10-year cancer control plan focused on prevention, early detection, and treatment. However, many administrative and social barriers have hindered its success, and a majority of patients are diagnosed at a late stage. Established in 2012, Partners for Cancer Care and Prevention (PFCCAP) works to decrease the burden of these cancers by mitigating the obstacles women face during their cancer diagnosis and treatment. Through community outreach meetings with medical personnel, hospital directors, and government officials, PFCCAP identified major barriers, including lack of trained health care personnel, few centers with adequate screening equipment, and a fragmented health system with significant administrative delays and poor continuity of care. Its solution included monthly teleconferences, biannual on-site training, quality control programs, and improved access to screening equipment. PFCCAP also initiated a patient navigation project. After implementation of the PFCCAP plan of action, from 2012 to 2018, the average time from initial consult to biopsy decreased from 65 to 20 days; from biopsy to diagnosis, 33 to 4 days; and from diagnosis to surgery, 121 to 60 days. To date, more than 1,500 women have benefited from this initiative, which has expanded to other regions. Overall, PFCCAP is creating centers of excellence in strategically located hospitals and promoting the implementation of national guidelines. Although several barriers still exist, PFCCAP is helping to implement an efficient health care model that can be replicated in other underserved populations.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsColombiaCommunity-Institutional RelationsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMass ScreeningMedically Underserved AreaPatient NavigationPilot ProjectsProgram EvaluationTelecommunicationsTime-to-TreatmentUterine Cervical Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID31260395
PMCPMC6613667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.