Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31260394›Full record

ArticleJournal of global oncology2019

Clinical Features and Outcomes of Invasive Breast Cancer: Age-Specific Analysis of a Modern Hospital-Based Registry.

Ji-Yeon Kim, Danbee Kang, Seok Jin Nam, Seok Won Kim, Jeong Eon Lee, Jong Han Yu, Se Kyung Lee, Young-Hyuck Im, Jin Seok Ahn, Eliseo Guallar and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of global oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Efficacy on symptoms and mortality day vs. night administration of EGFR-TKIs for advanced non-small cell lung cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Risk factors associated with palbociclib-induced neutropenia in patients with metastatic breast cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 10 countries.

Ji-Yeon KimSungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Danbee KangSungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seok Jin NamSungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seok Won KimSungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jeong Eon LeeSungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jong Han YuSungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Se Kyung LeeSungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Young-Hyuck ImSungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jin Seok AhnSungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Eliseo GuallarSungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Juhee ChoSungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yeon Hee ParkSungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ono Pharmaceutical (United Kingdom) · GBPfizer (United Kingdom) · GBPfizer (United States) · USAstraZeneca (Brazil) · BRAstraZeneca (Poland) · PLEisai (United Kingdom) · GBJanssen (Belgium) · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe evaluated the clinical features and outcomes of invasive breast cancer (BC) among different age groups by analyzing a modern BC registry including subtypes and treatment information.

methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of 6,405 women aged 18 years or older with pathologically confirmed stage I, II, or III BC who underwent curative surgery followed by adjuvant therapy at a university-based hospital in Seoul, South Korea, between January 2003 and December 2011. The study end point was all-cause mortality. We used Cox proportional hazards models and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs calculated after adjusting for age, body mass index, stage, subtype, and treatment, including type of surgery and use of chemotherapy, radiation therapy, hormone therapy, and targeted therapy.

resultsDuring 36,360 person-years of follow-up (median follow-up: 5.45 years; interquartile range, 4.3-7.1), 256 deaths were reported (mortality rate, 7.0/1,000 person-years). The adjusted HR for all-cause mortality was higher in patients older than 40 years (HR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.44 to 2.87) and older than 60 years (HR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.63 to 3.39) than in patients aged 40 to 49 years. Across age groups, advanced stage at diagnosis, luminal type as well as triple-negative BC, and not receiving adjuvant treatment were associated with increased risk of mortality.

conclusionA strong J-shaped relationship was observed between age and mortality, indicating worse clinical outcomes in young and old patients. This study suggested a possible benefit of personalized BC screening examination and precise and active treatment strategies to reduce BC-related mortality.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAge FactorsBreast NeoplasmsCause of DeathChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMastectomyMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRegistriesRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID31260394
PMCPMC6613670
OpenAlexW2956119214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.