Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31260042›Full record

ArticleJournal of pediatric psychology2019

A Primer on Mixed Methods for Pediatric Researchers.

Yelena P Wu, Janet A Deatrick, Elizabeth L McQuaid, Deborah Thompson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pediatric psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yelena P WuDepartment of Dermatology, University of Utah.
Janet A DeatrickSchool of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania.
Elizabeth L McQuaidDepartments of Psychiatry and Human Behavior and Pediatrics, Brown University, and.
Deborah ThompsonDepartment of Pediatrics-Nutrition, USDA/ARS Children's Nutrition Research Center, Baylor College of Medicine.

Funding

Translational Approaches to Melanoma Prevention in Children at High Genetic RiskK07CA196985 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI WU, YELENA PING · 2015 to 2019
$682k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA196985
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo provide a primer on conducting and analyzing mixed methods research studies, and to provide guidance on the write-up of mixed methods research.

methodsA question and answer format is used to provide an overview of mixed methods research study designs, tasks and considerations related to conducting and analyzing mixed methods studies, and recommendations for the write-up of results for mixed methods studies.

resultsIndividuals who conduct mixed methods research are encouraged to delineate the quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods features of the research and how these features fit with the overall study questions. Research teams will benefit from including individuals with expertise in qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research. Data integration should be a central component to the analysis and write-up of mixed methods research.

conclusionsIncreasing the use of mixed methods research in the field of pediatric psychology will contribute to advances in observational studies with children and families, intervention development and evaluation, and creation of new tools and assessments that aim to optimize child and family health outcomes.

Indexed as

Qualitative ResearchResearch DesignBiomedical ResearchChildHumansPediatricsPsychology, Childprofessional and training issuesqualitative methodsresearch design and methods

Identifiers

PMID31260042
PMCPMC6705711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.