Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31259597›Full record

ArticleHealth psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association2019

Reports of social circles' and own vaccination behavior: A national longitudinal survey.

Wändi Bruine de Bruin, Andrew M Parker, Mirta Galesic, Raffaele Vardavas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Perceived Social Norms Guide Health Care Decisions for Oneself and Others: A Cross-Sectional Experiment in a US Online Panel.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2022
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The influence of social norms varies with "others" groups: Evidence from COVID-19 vaccination intentions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wändi Bruine de BruinCentre for Decision Research, Leeds University Business School, University of Leeds.
Andrew M ParkerPittsburgh Office, RAND Corporation.ORCID 0000-0001-7511-0894
Mirta GalesicSanta Fe Institute.
Raffaele VardavasSanta Monica Office, RAND Corporation.

Funding

Modeling the Coupled Dynamics of Influenza Transmission and Vaccination BehaviorR01AI118705 · NIAID · RAND CORPORATION · PI PARKER, ANDREW, VARDAVAS, RAFFAELE · 2016 to 2020
$2.1M
Health Outcomes, Risk Perceptions and Preventative Behavior on Social NetworksR21CA157571 · NCI · RAND CORPORATION · PI VARDAVAS, RAFFAELE · 2011 to 2012
$420k
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNCI NIH HHS R21 CA157571NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI118705NIA NIH HHSSwedish Foundation for the Humanities and Social Sciences; Program on Science and Proven ExperienceUnited States Department of Agriculture; National Institute of Food and Agriculture
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFlu vaccinations are recommended for almost everyone, but uptake may vary because of perceived social norms. We aimed to examine the relationship between perceived social circle vaccine coverage (including family, friends, and acquaintances) and own vaccination behavior as well as potential mediators.

methodsIn 2011, 357 participants from RAND's American Life Panel reported perceived social circle vaccine coverage for the 2010-2011 flu season, own vaccination behavior for the 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 flu seasons, perceived flu risk without and with vaccination, and perceived vaccine safety. In 2012 and 2016, respectively, participants returned to report their own vaccination behavior for the 2011-2012 flu season (N = 338) and 2015-2016 flu season (N = 216).

resultsPerceiving greater percentage of 2010-2011 social circle vaccine coverage was associated with a greater likelihood of getting vaccinated in the 2010-2011 flu season (odds ratio [OR] = 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.01, 1.04) and the subsequent 2011-2012 flu season (OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 1.01, 1.03) but not the 2015-2016 flu season (OR = 1.00, 95% CI = .99, 1.01), as seen in logistic regressions that controlled for demographics and 2009-2010 vaccination behavior. All significant relationships between social circle vaccine coverage and own vaccination behavior were mediated by perceived flu risk without vaccination.

conclusionsPerceived social circle vaccine coverage is associated with own vaccination behavior in the current and subsequent flu season, establishing behavior patterns that may persist into the future. People's vaccination decisions may be informed by their perceptions of their peers' beliefs and behaviors. We discuss intervention strategies for promoting vaccine uptake by counteracting negative and promoting positive perceived social norms. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

FemaleHumansInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesLongitudinal StudiesMalePsychology, SocialSurveys and QuestionnairesInfluenza Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID31259597
PMCPMC7038818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.