Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31259571›Full record

ArticlePsychological assessment2019

Evaluating construct equivalence of youth depression measures across multiple measures and multiple studies.

George W Howe, Getachew A Dagne, C Hendricks Brown, Ahnalee M Brincks, William Beardslee, Tatiana Perrino, Hilda Pantin

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological assessment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. The Impact of Sparse Datasets When Harmonizing Data from Studies with Different Measures of the Same Construct.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Retrospective Psychometrics and Effect Heterogeneity in Integrated Data Analysis: Commentary on the Special Issue.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

George W HoweDepartment of Psychology.ORCID 0000-0001-8303-9768
Getachew A DagneCollege of Public Health.
C Hendricks BrownFeinberg School of Medicine.
Ahnalee M BrincksDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics.
William BeardsleeDepartment of Psychiatry.
Tatiana PerrinoDepartment of Public Health Sciences.
Hilda PantinDepartment of Public Health Sciences.

Funding

STATISTICAL METHODS FOR MENTAL HEALTH PREVENTIVE TRIALSR01MH040859 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI BROWN, C. HENDRICKS · 1986 to 2014
$7.5M
Synthesis of Trials to Prevent Suicide Risk Behavior in Sexual and Gender MinoritiesR01MH117598 · NIMH · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI BROWN, C. HENDRICKS · 2018 to 2021
$2.0M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH040859NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH117598
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Construct equivalence of measures across studies is necessary for synthesizing results when combining data in meta-analysis or integrative data analysis. We discuss several assumptions required for construct equivalence, and review methods using individual-level data and item response theory (IRT) analysis for detecting or adjusting for violations of these assumptions. We apply IRT to data from 7 measures of depressive symptoms for 4,283 youth from 16 randomized prevention trials. Findings indicate that these data violate assumptions of conditional independence. Bifactor IRT models find that depression measures contain substantial reporter variance, and indicate that a single common factor model would be substantially biased. Separate analyses of ratings by youth find stronger evidence for construct equivalence, but factor invariance across sex and age does not hold. We conclude that data synthesis studies employing measures of youth depression should analyze results separately by reporter, explore more complex approaches to integrate these different perspectives, and explore methods that adjust for sex and age differences in item functioning. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Psychiatric Status Rating ScalesResearch DesignAdolescentData Interpretation, StatisticalDepressionHumansModels, TheoreticalRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID31259571
PMCPMC6716510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.