Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31259317›Full record

ArticleGates open research2019

A testing cascade to identify repurposed insecticides for next-generation vector control tools: screening a panel of chemistries with novel modes of action against a malaria vector.

Rosemary Lees, Giorgio Praulins, Rachel Davies, Faye Brown, George Parsons, Anthony White, Hilary Ranson, Graham Small, David Malone

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gates open research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rosemary LeesLiverpool Insect Testing Establishment (LITE), Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4232-9125
Giorgio PraulinsVector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2601-2598
Rachel DaviesVector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.
Faye BrownLiverpool Insect Testing Establishment (LITE), Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.
George ParsonsLiverpool Insect Testing Establishment (LITE), Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.
Anthony WhiteInnovative Vector Control Consortium (IVCC), Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, Merseyside, L3 5QA, UK.
Hilary RansonVector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.
Graham SmallInnovative Vector Control Consortium (IVCC), Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, Merseyside, L3 5QA, UK.
David MaloneInnovative Vector Control Consortium (IVCC), Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, Merseyside, L3 5QA, UK.
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Anopheles gambiaeIndoor Residual SpraysInsecticideLong lasting insecticidal netsResistance ManagementVector control

Identifiers

PMID31259317
PMCPMC6556762
OpenAlexW2946214145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.