ArticleBMJ open quality2019
Development and initial testing of a Health Confidence Score (HCS).
Article in BMJ open quality, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07458841 (Effectiveness of the Nurse-led Discharge Interventions in Promoting Hospital Patients' Primary Health Care Outcomes on Discharge), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effectiveness of the Nurse-led Discharge Interventions in Promoting Hospital Patients' Primary Health Care Outcomes on Discharge: A Proof-of-concept Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- What Is the Association Between Agency and Levels of Capability and Comfort in Musculoskeletal Care? A Systematic Review.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2024Pooled it
- A Digital Asthma Self-Management Program for Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2025Trial
- PEER CONNECT: a pragmatic feasibility randomised controlled trial of peer coaching for adults with long-term conditions.BMJ open · 2024Trial
- Nurse-led risk-based primary healthcare intervention in midlife women's health management in Hong Kong: a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial protocol.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Personalizing prostate cancer education for patients using an EHR-Integrated LLM agent.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Implementation of an Australian helpline for low back pain: protocol of a type 2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Evaluating the role of visit audio recordings in triadic dementia care: study protocol.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Clinical and patient-reported outcomes of self-administered outpatient parenteral antimicrobial treatment (S-OPAT): a scoping review.Infection · 2025Article
- Measuring health confidence: benefits to patients, clinicians and healthcare providers.BMJ open quality · 2025Article
- Pilot study evaluating frailty-focused care for hospitalised patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.BMJ open quality · 2025Article
- Article
- Exploring Older Adults' Needs for a Healthy Life and eHealth: Qualitative Interview Study.JMIR human factors · 2025Article
- Article
- Development and validation of the Health Activation Scale for Children (HAS-C): an important intermediate outcome measure for health promotion initiatives.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Association of health confidence with hospital length of stay and readmission.Journal of hospital medicine · 2024Article
- Management of urinary tract infections in the community: a clinical audit and patient survey.BJGP open · 2023Article
- The impact of ageing on adults with cerebral palsy: the results of a national online survey.BJGP open · 2023Article
- Exploring health seeking behaviors for common cold management.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2023Article
- A digital approach to asthma self-management in adults: Protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.Contemporary clinical trials · 2022Article
- Protocol for a pragmatic feasibility randomised controlled trial of peer coaching for adults with long-term conditions: PEER CONNECT.BMJ open · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Patients need to feel confident about looking after their own health. This is needed to improve patient outcomes and clinical support. With few suitable tools available to measure self-care health confidence, we developed and validated a short, generic survey instrument for use in evaluation and quality improvement. Methods: The Health Confidence Score (HCS) was developed through literature review, patient and expert focus groups and discussions. This paper reports an initial survey (n = 1031, study 1) which identified some issues and a further face-to-face survey (n = 378, study 2) to test the construct and concurrent validity of the final version. Scores were correlated against the My Health Confidence (MHC) rating scale, howRu (health status measure) and relevant demographics. Results: The HCS is short (50 words) with good readability (reading age 8). It has four items covering health knowledge, capability to self-manage, access to help and shared decision-making; each has four response options (strongly agree, agree, neutral disagree). Items are reported independently and as a summary score.The mean summary score was 76.7 (SD 20.4) on 0-100 scale. Cronbach's alpha = 0.82. Exploratory factor analysis suggested that the four items relate to a single dimension. Correlation of the HCS summary score with MHC was high (Spearman r = 0.76). It was also associated with health status (Spearman r = 0.49), negatively with number of medications taken (r=-0.29) and age (r=-0.22) and not with ethnicity, having children or education level. Conclusions: The HCS is short, easy to use, with good psychometric properties and construct validity. Each item is meaningful independently and the summary score gives an overall picture of health confidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.