Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31259277›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2019

Development and initial testing of a Health Confidence Score (HCS).

Tim Benson, Henry W W Potts, Pippa Bark, Clive Bowman

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07458841 (Effectiveness of the Nurse-led Discharge Interventions in Promoting Hospital Patients' Primary Health Care Outcomes on Discharge), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07458841 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of the Nurse-led Discharge Interventions in Promoting Hospital Patients' Primary Health Care Outcomes on Discharge: A Proof-of-concept Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Hong KongRan2026 to 2027Enrolled120ConditionsPrimary HealthcareArmsPrimary healthcare discharge education, specially-designed health education leaflet, Patient discharge package, usual hospital discharge practice
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Exploring health seeking behaviors for common cold management.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tim BensonR-Outcomes Ltd, Thatcham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2101-1353
Henry W W PottsInstitute of Health Informatics, UCL, London, UK.
Pippa BarkInstitute of Health Informatics, UCL, London, UK.
Clive BowmanSchool of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Patients need to feel confident about looking after their own health. This is needed to improve patient outcomes and clinical support. With few suitable tools available to measure self-care health confidence, we developed and validated a short, generic survey instrument for use in evaluation and quality improvement. Methods: The Health Confidence Score (HCS) was developed through literature review, patient and expert focus groups and discussions. This paper reports an initial survey (n = 1031, study 1) which identified some issues and a further face-to-face survey (n = 378, study 2) to test the construct and concurrent validity of the final version. Scores were correlated against the My Health Confidence (MHC) rating scale, howRu (health status measure) and relevant demographics. Results: The HCS is short (50 words) with good readability (reading age 8). It has four items covering health knowledge, capability to self-manage, access to help and shared decision-making; each has four response options (strongly agree, agree, neutral disagree). Items are reported independently and as a summary score.The mean summary score was 76.7 (SD 20.4) on 0-100 scale. Cronbach's alpha = 0.82. Exploratory factor analysis suggested that the four items relate to a single dimension. Correlation of the HCS summary score with MHC was high (Spearman r = 0.76). It was also associated with health status (Spearman r = 0.49), negatively with number of medications taken (r=-0.29) and age (r=-0.22) and not with ethnicity, having children or education level. Conclusions: The HCS is short, easy to use, with good psychometric properties and construct validity. Each item is meaningful independently and the summary score gives an overall picture of health confidence.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionFocus GroupsHealth LiteracyHumansPsychometricsQuality of Health CareReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesattitudeshealthcare quality improvementpatient-centred carequality measurementsurveys

Identifiers

PMID31259277
PMCPMC6568167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.