Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31259268›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2019

Increasing the use of home medication lists in an outpatient neurorehabilitation clinic.

Meiqi Guo, Alan Tam, Ayan Dey, Beth Fraser, Margaret Podalak, Mark Bayley, Christine Soong, Alexander Lo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Meiqi GuoDivision of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Alan TamDivision of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ayan DeyFaculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Beth FraserUniversity Health Network, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Margaret PodalakUniversity Health Network, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mark BayleyUniversity Health Network, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Christine SoongDivision of General Internal Medicine, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Alexander LoUniversity Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medication reconciliation in ambulatory care settings helps prevent adverse drug events. Patient involvement in the process is crucial, as clinicians must verify the reported medication history with other sources such as home medication lists or brown-bagged home medications provided by patients. However, only 47.8% of brain injury and stroke adult outpatients at Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, an academic rehabilitation hospital, bring their medications/medication lists to clinic visits. In turn, missing medication information impacts the clinic by causing delays in treatment and interrupted clinic flow. This project aimed to increase the percentage of patients who bring their medications/medication lists to 80% and decrease the impact on clinic visits caused by missing medication information to 10%. This was a controlled before-after study, with the outpatient rehabilitation assessment (OPRA) clinic as the intervention and the spasticity clinic as the control. The model for improvement was used as the project framework. Process mapping, Ishikawa diagrams, driver diagrams and patient surveys generated the change ideas. Verbal reminders during confirmation phone calls, written reminders and medication list templates were implemented. Data were collected on a biweekly basis and analysed using statistical control charts. After six Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles conducted over 49 weeks, both project aims were achieved. The percentage of OPRA clinic patients who brought medications/medication lists was 81.8% and the impact on clinic visits caused by missing medication information was 9.1% of clinic visits. Special cause variation was detected on the statistical control charts. Conversely, there was no special cause variation for the spasticity clinic (the control) for either aim. Lessons learnt include the importance of prolonged data collection when implementing interventions with long lag time, and that verbal reminders may not be effective for patients with cognitive impairments. Future efforts may focus on implementing the bundle of project interventions for the spasticity clinic.

Indexed as

Data CollectionNeurological RehabilitationOutpatientsRecordsAmbulatory Care FacilitiesControlled Before-After StudiesDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHumansMedication ReconciliationOntarioPatient Participationambulatory carehealthcare quality improvementmedication reconciliation

Identifiers

PMID31259268
PMCPMC6567944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.