Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31259264›Full record

ArticleEuropean stroke journal2019

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of cognitive impairment no dementia in the first year post-stroke.

Eithne Sexton, Affraic McLoughlin, David J Williams, Niamh A Merriman, Nora Donnelly, Daniela Rohde, Anne Hickey, Maev-Ann Wren, Kathleen Bennett

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European stroke journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 133 papers, 16 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
133citing papers in PubMed, 16 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

133 citing papers in PubMed, 16 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Cognitive impairment after a stroke in young adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Occupational therapy for cognitive impairment in stroke patients.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Current Update on the Clinical Utility of MMSE and MoCA for Stroke Patients in Asia: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  16. Pooled it
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

73 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Eithne SextonDepartment of Psychology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5564-7771
Affraic McLoughlinDepartment of Psychology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
David J WilliamsDepartment of Geriatric and Stroke Medicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Niamh A MerrimanDepartment of Psychology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Nora DonnellySocial Research Division, Economic and Social Research Institute, Dublin, Ireland.
Daniela RohdeDepartment of Psychology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8834-2539
Anne HickeyDepartment of Psychology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0008-3195
Maev-Ann WrenSocial Research Division, Economic and Social Research Institute, Dublin, Ireland.
Kathleen BennettDivision of Population Health Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIncreasing attention is being paid to interventions for cognitive impairment (CI) post-stroke, including for CI that does not meet dementia criteria. The aim of this paper was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of cognitive impairment no dementia (CIND) within one year post-stroke. PATIENTS AND

methodsPubmed, EMBASE and PsychInfo were searched for papers published in English in 1995-2017. Included studies were population or hospital-based cohort studies for first-ever/recurrent stroke, assessing CIND using standardised criteria at 1-12 months post-stroke. Abstracts were screened, followed by full text review of potentially relevant articles. Data were extracted using a standard form, and study quality was appraised using the Crowe Critical Appraisal Tool. A pooled prevalence of CIND with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was estimated using random-effects meta-analysis. Heterogeneity was measured using the I

resultsA total of 7000 abstracts were screened, followed by 1028 full text articles. Twenty-three articles were included in the systematic review, and 21 in the meta-analysis. The pooled CIND prevalence was 38% [95% CI = 32-43%] (I

Indexed as

cognitiondementiaStrokesystematic reviews

Identifiers

PMID31259264
PMCPMC6591758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.