ArticleMDM policy & practice
Patient-Centered Approach to Develop the Patient's Preferences for Prostate Cancer Care (PreProCare) Tool.
Article in MDM policy & practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- What matters to society when making decisions about reimbursing drugs for prostate cancer: a discrete choice experiment.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2026Article
- Embedding a Choice Experiment in an Online Decision Aid or Tool: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Urinary Incontinence Following Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Literature Review.Cureus · 2024Review
- Trajectory of Depression among Prostate Cancer Patients: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.Cancers · 2023Article
- Impact of Health-related Quality of Life and Prediagnosis Risk of Major Depressive Disorder on Treatment Choice in Low- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer.European urology open science · 2020Article
- Sources of Information for Learning and Decision-Making in Men With Localized Prostate Cancer.American journal of men's healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.