Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31259199›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2019

Multisite evaluation of radiomic feature reproducibility and discriminability for identifying peripheral zone prostate tumors on MRI.

Prathyush Chirra, Patrick Leo, Michael Yim, B Nicolas Bloch, Ardeshir R Rastinehad, Andrei Purysko, Mark Rosen, Anant Madabhushi, Satish E Viswanath

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Prathyush ChirraCase Western Reserve University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.
Patrick LeoCase Western Reserve University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.
Michael YimNortheast Ohio Medical University, College of Medicine, Rootstown, Ohio, United States.
B Nicolas BlochBoston University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Ardeshir R RastinehadIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Department of Urology, New York, New York, United States.
Andrei PuryskoCleveland Clinic, Department of Radiology, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6888-0417
Mark RosenHospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Department of Radiology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Anant MadabhushiCase Western Reserve University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5741-0399
Satish E ViswanathCase Western Reserve University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4550-8337

Funding

Computerized histologic image predictor of cancer outcomeR01CA202752 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI FELDMAN, MICHAEL D, GANESAN, SHRIDAR · 2016 to 2020
$3.1M
Quantitative Histomorphometric Risk Classifier (QuHbIC) in HPV + Oropharyngeal CarcinomaR01CA220581 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KOYFMAN, SHLOMO, LEWIS, JAMES · 2018 to 2023
$3.1M
Computerized Histologic Risk Predictor (CHiRP) for Early Stage Lung CancersR01CA216579 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI FU, PINGFU, LLOYD, MARK · 2018 to 2023
$3.1M
MR Fingerprinting and Computerized Decision Support for Prostate CancerR01CA208236 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GULANI, VIKAS, PONSKY, LEE EVAN · 2017 to 2022
$3.0M
Pathology Image Informatics Platform for visualization, analysis and managementU24CA199374 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI GURCAN, METIN NAFI, MADABHUSHI, ANANT · 2015 to 2019
$2.9M
HistoTools: A suite of digital pathology tools for quality control, annotation and dataset identificationU01CA239055 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI JANOWCZYK, ANDREW ROBERT, MADABHUSHI, ANANT · 2019 to 2022
$1.0M
RadIO: A Novel Radiomics Toolkit to Predict and Characterize Response to Immunotherapy in Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung CancerI01BX004121 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI Anant Madabhushi, Charles J Nock · 2019 to 2026
–
BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH FACILITIESC06RR012463 · NCRR · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KUTINA, KENNETH L · 1997 to 1997
–
BLRD VA I01 BX004121NCI NIH HHS R01 CA202752NCI NIH HHS R01 CA208236NCI NIH HHS R01 CA216579NCI NIH HHS R01 CA220581NCI NIH HHS U01 CA239055NCI NIH HHS U24 CA199374NCRR NIH HHS C06 RR012463
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in the field of radiomics have enabled the development of a number of prognostic and predictive imaging-based tools for a variety of diseases. However, wider clinical adoption of these tools is contingent on their generalizability across multiple sites and scanners. This may be particularly relevant in the context of radiomic features derived from T1- or T2-weighted magnetic resonance images (MRIs), where signal intensity values are known to lack tissue-specific meaning and vary based on differing acquisition protocols between institutions. We present the first empirical study of benchmarking five different radiomic feature families in terms of both reproducibility and discriminability in a multisite setting, specifically, for identifying prostate tumors in the peripheral zone on MRI. Our cohort comprised 147 patient T2-weighted MRI datasets from four different sites, all of which are first preprocessed to correct for acquisition-related artifacts such as bias field, differing voxel resolutions, and intensity drift (nonstandardness). About 406 three-dimensional voxel-wise radiomic features from five different families (gray, Haralick, gradient, Laws, and Gabor) were evaluated in a cross-site setting to determine (a) how reproducible they are within a relatively homogeneous nontumor tissue region and (b) how well they could discriminate tumor regions from nontumor regions. Our results demonstrate that a majority of the popular Haralick features are reproducible in over 99% of all cross-site comparisons, as well as achieve excellent cross-site discriminability (classification accuracy of

Indexed as

discriminabilityfeature analysismagnetic resonance imagingmultisiteprostateradiomicsreproducibilitystability

Identifiers

PMID31259199
PMCPMC6566001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.