Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31259094›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2019

Antioxidant activity, α-glucosidase inhibition and phytochemical profiling of

James William, Peter John, Muhammad Waseem Mumtaz, Ayoub Rashid Ch, Ahmad Adnan, Hamid Mukhtar, Shahzad Sharif, Syed Ali Raza, Muhammad Tayyab Akhtar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. UPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS Profiling of Phenolic Compounds fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  7. Molecular Structure-Based Screening of the Constituents ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

James WilliamDepartment of Chemistry, Government College University Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Peter JohnDepartment of Chemistry, Government College University Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Muhammad Waseem MumtazDepartment of Chemistry, University of Gujrat, Gujrat, Pakistan.
Ayoub Rashid ChDepartment of Chemistry, Government College University Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Ahmad AdnanDepartment of Chemistry, Government College University Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Hamid MukhtarInstitute of Industrial Biotechnology, Government College University Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Shahzad SharifDepartment of Chemistry, Government College University Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Syed Ali RazaDepartment of Chemistry, Government College University Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-4624-9683
Muhammad Tayyab AkhtarInstitute of Industrial Biotechnology, Government College University Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Government College University, Lahore · PKUniversity of Gujrat · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetes mellitus type II (DMT-2) is a widely spread metabolic disorder both in developed and developing countries. The role of oxidative stress is well established in DMT-2 pathogenesis. The synthetic drugs for DMT-2 are associated with serious side complications. Antioxidant and α-glucosidase inhibitory actions of phytochemicals from various plant species are considered as an alternative to synthetic drugs for DMT-2 management. The present study aimed to evaluate the antioxidant activity, α-glucosidase inhibitory potential and phytochemical profiling of

methodsThe total phenolic and flavonoid contents, in vitro antioxidant activity (α, α-diphenyl-β-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free radical scavenging and phosphomolybdenum method) and α-glucosidase inhibition of ultrasonicated hydroethanolic RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Findings leaped 60% ethanolic extract as rich fraction regarding total phenolic and flavonoid contents. The 60% ethanolic fraction was a promising source of natural antioxidants and α-glucosidase inhibitory agents as indicated by anti-radical and enzyme inibitory activities. Kaempferol, rutin, hesperetin 5-O-glucoside, kaempferol-coumaroyl-glucoside, luteolin 3-glucoside, Isorhamnetin-3-O-rutinoside, trimethoxyflavone derivatives and citric acid were identified by UHPLC-Q-TOF-MS/MS. These compounds were believed to be responsible for the strong antioxidant and enzyme inhibitory activity of plant extracts. The extensive metabolite profiling of

Indexed as

AntidiabeticAntioxidantDiabetes mellitusHyophorbe lagenicaulisUHPLC-Q-TOF-MS/MS

Identifiers

PMID31259094
PMCPMC6589327
OpenAlexW2949890011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.