ArticleBiomedical optics express2019
Quantitative phase imaging of adherent mammalian cells: a comparative study.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Extended Field of View and Resolution Enhancement in Lensless Digital Holography.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Sweet Science: Exploring the Impact of Fructose and Glucose on Brown Adipocyte Differentiation Using Optical Diffraction Tomography.Journal of cellular biochemistry · 2025Article
- Quantitative phase microscopies: accuracy comparison.Light, science & applications · 2024Review
- Detecting abnormal cell behaviors from dry mass time series.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Optical diffraction tomography and Raman spectroscopy reveal distinct cellular phenotypes during white and brown adipocyte differentiation.Biosensors & bioelectronics · 2023Article
- Biomass measurements of single neuritesBiomedical optics express · 2022Article
- Review
- A new ultradian rhythm in mammalian cell dry mass observed by holography.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Alternation of inverse problem approach and deep learning for lens-free microscopy image reconstruction.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Computationally enhanced quantitative phase microscopy reveals autonomous oscillations in mammalian cell growth.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Quantitative phase imaging methods have several advantages when it comes to monitoring cultures of adherent mammalian cells. Because of low photo-toxicity and no need for staining, we can follow cells in a minimally invasive way over a long period of time. The ability to measure the optical path difference in a quantitative manner allows the measurement of the cell dry mass, an important metric for studying the growth kinetics of mammalian cells. Here we present and compare cell measurements obtained with three different techniques: digital holographic microscopy, lens-free microscopy and quadriwave lateral sheering interferometry. We report a linear relationship between optical volume density values measured with these different techniques and estimate the precisions of this measurement for the different individual instruments.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.