ArticleBiomedical optics express2019
Automatic assessment of tear film and tear meniscus parameters in healthy subjects using ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reference Estimates of Mean Tear Film Lipid Layer Thickness Measured with LipiViewJournal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Subconjunctival injectable platelet-rich fibrin for severe dry eye disease: Preliminary clinical results.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
- Anterior segment optical coherence tomography study of the cornea and tear film after systemic isotretinoin treatment in acne vulgaris.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Observational
- Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Corneal Diseases.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Development and multicenter validation of an AI driven model for quantitative meibomian gland evaluation.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence-assisted tear meniscus height measurement: a multicenter study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Validation of a Semiautomatic Optical Coherence Tomography Digital Image Processing Algorithm for Estimating the Tear Meniscus Height.Translational vision science & technology · 2023Article
- Dynamic Aspects of Pre-Soft Contact Lens Tear Film and Their Relation to Dry Eye: Basic Science and Clinical Relevance.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Measurement method of tear meniscus height based on deep learning.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Automation of dry eye disease quantitative assessment: A review.Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2022Review
- The Development and Clinical Application of Innovative Optical Ophthalmic Imaging Techniques.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
- Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography of Tear Film and Cornea in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2021Article
- Novel Approaches for Imaging-Based Diagnosis of Ocular Surface Disease.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Deep learning segmentation for optical coherence tomography measurements of the lower tear meniscus.Biomedical optics express · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many different parameters exist for the investigation of tear film dynamics. We present a new tear meniscus segmentation algorithm which automatically extracts tear meniscus area (TMA), height (TMH), depth (TMD) and radius (TMR) from UHR-OCT measurements and apply it to a data set including repeated measurements from ten healthy subjects. Mean values and standard deviations are 0.0174 ± 0.007 mm
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.