Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31259026›Full record

ArticleAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science2019

Assessing the Readability of Freely Available ICU Notes.

Wu-Chen Su, Kevin Dufendach, Danny T Y Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wu-Chen SuDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.
Kevin DufendachDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.
Danny T Y WuDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unstructured data stored in an electronic health record (EHR) system can be very informative but require techniques such as natural language processing to extract the information. Developing such techniques requires shared data, but clinical data are often not easy to access. A freely available intensive care unit database, MIMIC-III, was released in 2016 to address this issue and benefit the informatics research community. While the database has been utilized by a few studies, the text characteristics of the notes have not been summarized. In this study, we present the summary of the basic text characteristics and the readability of the MIMIC-III ICU notes. We further compare the results with our previous study where proprietary EHR notes were used. The results show that the text

Identifiers

PMID31259026
PMCPMC6568110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.