Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31259015›Full record

ArticleAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science2019

Implementation of Informatics to Support the NIH

Scott P Turner, Sean T Pompea, Kelly L Williams, David A Kraemer, Evan T Sholle, Cindy Chen, Curtis L Cole, Rainu Kaushal, Thomas R Campion

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. TheAnnual review of biomedical data science · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A Method for Integrating Healthcare Provider Organization and Research Sponsor Systems and Workflows to Support Large-Scale Studies.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Scott P TurnerInformation Technologies & Services Department, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Sean T PompeaInformation Technologies & Services Department, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Kelly L WilliamsDepartment of Healthcare Policy & Research, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
David A KraemerInformation Technologies & Services Department, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Evan T SholleInformation Technologies & Services Department, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Cindy ChenInformation Technologies & Services Department, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Curtis L ColeInformation Technologies & Services Department, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Rainu KaushalDepartment of Healthcare Policy & Research, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Thomas R CampionInformation Technologies & Services Department, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.

Funding

Adaptive Platform for Personalized EngagementU24OD023163 · OD · VIGNET, INC. · PI JAIN, PRADUMAN · 2017 to 2020
$102.6M
Disparities in COVID Disease Severity and Outcomes in New York CityUL1TR002384 · NCATS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI JULIANNE L IMPERATO-MCGINLEY · 2017 to 2026
$86.2M
Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR000457 · NCATS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI IMPERATO-MCGINLEY, JULIANNE L · 2012 to 2016
$46.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000457NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002384NIH HHS U24 OD023163
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The NIH All of Us Research Program, a national effort to collect biospecimens and health data for over one million participants from across the United States, requires participating healthcare provider organizations (HPOs) to use informatics tools maintained by the NIH to manage participant consent, biospecimen processing, physical measurements, and other workflows. HPOs also maintain distinct workflows for handling overlapping tasks within their individual aegis, which do not necessarily achieve seamless interoperability with NIH-maintained cloud-based systems. At our HPO, we implemented informatics to address gaps in enrollment workflows and hardware, clinical workflow integration, patient engagement, laboratory support, and study team reporting. In this case report we detail our approach to inform efforts at other institutions for the NIH All of Us Research Program and other studies.

Identifiers

PMID31259015
PMCPMC6568061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.