Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31259007›Full record

ArticleAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science2019

Network Abstractions of Prescription Patterns in a Medicaid Population.

Radhakrishnan Nagarajan, Jeffery Talbert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Radhakrishnan NagarajanDivision of Biomedical Informatics.
Jeffery TalbertDepartment of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Kentucky, KY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding prescription patterns have relied largely on aggregate statistical measures. Evidence of doctor- shopping, inappropriate prescribing, drug diversion and patient seeking prescription drugs across multiple prescribers demand understanding the concerted working of prescribers and prescriber communities as opposed to treating them as independent entities. We model potential associations between prescribers as prescriber-prescriber network (PPN) and subsequently investigate its properties across Schedule II, III, IV drugs in a single month in a Medicaid population. Community structure detection algorithms and geo-spatial layouts revealed characteristic patterns in PPN markedly different from their random graph surrogate counterparts rejecting them as potential generative mechanism. Outlier detection with recommended thresholds also revealed a subset of prescriber specialties to be constitutively flagged across Schedule II, III, IV drugs. Presence of prescriber communities may assist in targeted monitoring and their deviation from random graphs may serve as a metric in assessing PPN evolution temporally and pre-/post- interventions.

Identifiers

PMID31259007
PMCPMC6568084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.