Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31258998›Full record

ArticleAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science2019

Deep Neural Architectures for Discourse Segmentation in E-Mail Based Behavioral Interventions.

Mehedi Hasan, Alexander Kotov, Sylvie Naar, Gwen L Alexander, April Idalski Carcone

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Developing Machine Learning Models for Behavioral Coding.Journal of pediatric psychology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mehedi HasanDepartment of Computer Science, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
Alexander KotovDepartment of Computer Science, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
Sylvie NaarCenter for Translational Behavioral Research, Department of Behavioral Sciences and Social Medicine, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida.
Gwen L AlexanderDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan.
April Idalski CarconeDepartment of Family Medicine and Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
Wayne State University · USHenry Ford Health System · US

Funding

Encouraging Young Adults to Make Effective Nutrition Choices: MENU Gen Y StudyR01HD067314 · NICHD · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI ALEXANDER, GWEN LEIGH · 2012 to 2016
$2.8M
Automated Coding of eCoaching Exchanges to Promote Healthier EatingR21DK108071 · NIDDK · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CARCONE, APRIL MARIE IDALSKI, KOTOV, ALEXANDER · 2016 to 2017
$425k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD067314NIDDK NIH HHS R21 DK108071
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Communication science approaches to develop effective behavior interventions, such as motivational interviewing (MI), are limited by traditional qualitative coding of communication exchanges, a very resource-intensive and time-consuming process. This study focuses on the analysis of e-Coaching sessions, behavior interventions delivered via email and grounded in the principles of MI. A critical step towards automated qualitative coding of e-Coaching sessions is segmentation of emails into fragments that correspond to MI behaviors. This study frames email segmentation task as a classification problem and utilizes word and punctuation mark embeddings in conjunction with part-of-speech features to address it. We evaluated the performance of conditional random fields (CRF) as well as multi-layer perceptron (MLP), bi-directional recurrent neural network (BRNN) and convolutional recurrent neural network (CRNN) for the task of email segmentation. Our results indicate that CRNN outperforms CRF, MLP and BRNN achieving 0.989 weighted macro-averaged F1-measure and 0.825 F1-measure for new segment detection.

Identifiers

PMID31258998
PMCPMC6568107
OpenAlexW3022823628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.