Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31258994›Full record

ArticleAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science2019

Building Computational Models to Predict One-Year Mortality in ICU Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Post Myocardial Infarction Syndrome.

Laura A Barrett, Seyedeh Neelufar Payrovnaziri, Jiang Bian, Zhe He

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Machine learning prediction of mortality in Acute Myocardial Infarction.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. DeepConsensus: Consensus-based Interpretable Deep Neural Networks with Application to Mortality Prediction.Proceedings of ... International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. International Joint Conference on Neural Networks · 2020
    Article
  15. Using Machine Learning to Predict Hyperchloremia in Critically Ill Patients.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laura A BarrettSchool of Information, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.
Seyedeh Neelufar PayrovnaziriSchool of Information, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.
Jiang BianDepartment of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Zhe HeSchool of Information, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.

Funding

Systematic Analysis of Clinical Study Generalizability Assessment Methods with InformaticsR21AG061431 · NIA · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BIAN, JIANG, HE, ZHE · 2019 to 2020
$793k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG061431
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heart disease remains the leading cause of death in the United States. Compared with risk assessment guidelines that require manual calculation of scores, machine learning-based prediction for disease outcomes such as mortality can be utilized to save time and improve prediction accuracy. This study built and evaluated various machine learning models to predict one-year mortality in patients diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction or post myocardial infarction syndrome in the MIMIC-III database. The results of the best performing shallow prediction models were compared to a deep feedforward neural network (Deep FNN) with back propagation. We included a cohort of 5436 admissions. Six datasets were developed and compared. The models applying Logistic Model Trees (LMT) and Simple Logistic algorithms to the combined dataset resulted in the highest prediction accuracy at 85.12% and the highest AUC at .901. In addition, other factors were observed to have an impact on outcomes as well.

Identifiers

PMID31258994
PMCPMC6568079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.