Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31258975›Full record

ArticleAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science2019

Context-Driven Concept Annotation in Radiology Reports: Anatomical Phrase Labeling.

Henghui Zhu, Ioannis Ch Paschalidis, Christopher Hall, Amir Tahmasebi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Henghui ZhuDivision of Systems Engineering, Boston University, Brookline, MA, USA.
Ioannis Ch PaschalidisDivision of Systems Engineering, Boston University, Brookline, MA, USA.
Christopher HallRadiology Solutions, Philips Healthcare, Andover, MA, USA.
Amir TahmasebiPhilips Research North America, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During a radiology reading session, it is common that the radiologist refers back to the prior history of the patient for comparison. As a result, structuring of radiology report content for seamless, fast, and accurate access is in high demand in Radiology Information Systems (RIS). A common approach for defining a structure is based on the anatomical sites of radiological observations. Nevertheless, the language used for referring to and describing anatomical regions varies quite significantly among radiologists. Conventional approaches relying on ontology-based keyword matching fail to achieve acceptable precision and recall in anatomical phrase labeling in radiology reports due to such variation in language. In this work, a novel context-driven anatomical labeling framework is proposed. The proposed framework consists of two parallel Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN), one for inferring the context of a sentence and the other for word (token)-level labeling. The proposed framework was trained on a large set of radiology reports from a clinical site and evaluated on reports from two other clinical sites. The proposed framework outperformed the state-of-the-art approaches, especially in correctly labeling ambiguous cases.

Identifiers

PMID31258975
PMCPMC6568085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.