ArticleAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science2019
Context-Driven Concept Annotation in Radiology Reports: Anatomical Phrase Labeling.
Article in AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of natural language processing applied to radiology reports.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021Pooled it
- Cancer staging data collection using rules-based natural language processing for entity extraction from pathology notifications: the WA cancer staging project.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Context-Aware Sentence Classification of Radiology Reports Using Synthetic Data: Development and Validation Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During a radiology reading session, it is common that the radiologist refers back to the prior history of the patient for comparison. As a result, structuring of radiology report content for seamless, fast, and accurate access is in high demand in Radiology Information Systems (RIS). A common approach for defining a structure is based on the anatomical sites of radiological observations. Nevertheless, the language used for referring to and describing anatomical regions varies quite significantly among radiologists. Conventional approaches relying on ontology-based keyword matching fail to achieve acceptable precision and recall in anatomical phrase labeling in radiology reports due to such variation in language. In this work, a novel context-driven anatomical labeling framework is proposed. The proposed framework consists of two parallel Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN), one for inferring the context of a sentence and the other for word (token)-level labeling. The proposed framework was trained on a large set of radiology reports from a clinical site and evaluated on reports from two other clinical sites. The proposed framework outperformed the state-of-the-art approaches, especially in correctly labeling ambiguous cases.
Identifiers
31258975PMC6568085What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.