Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31258968›Full record

ArticleAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science2019

Evaluation of a REDCap-based Workflow for Supporting Federal Guidance for Electronic Informed Consent.

Cindy Chen, Scott P Turner, Evan T Sholle, Scott W Brown, Vanessa L I Blau, Julianna P Brouwer, Alicia N Lewis, Curtis L Cole, David M Nanus, Manish A Shah and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Shifting Mindsets: The Impact of a Patient Portal on Functioning and Recovery in a Mental Health Setting.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Embedding research study recruitment within the patient portal preCheck-in.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Remote Methods for Conducting Tobacco-Focused Clinical Trials.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Cindy ChenInformation Technologies & Services Department, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Scott P TurnerInformation Technologies & Services Department, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Evan T SholleInformation Technologies & Services Department, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Scott W BrownInformation Technologies & Services Department, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Vanessa L I BlauInformation Technologies & Services Department, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Julianna P BrouwerDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Alicia N LewisDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Curtis L ColeInformation Technologies & Services Department, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
David M NanusDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Manish A ShahDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
John P LeonardDepartment of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Thomas R CampionInformation Technologies & Services Department, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.

Funding

Disparities in COVID Disease Severity and Outcomes in New York CityUL1TR002384 · NCATS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI JULIANNE L IMPERATO-MCGINLEY · 2017 to 2026
$86.2M
Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR000457 · NCATS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI IMPERATO-MCGINLEY, JULIANNE L · 2012 to 2016
$46.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000457NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002384
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adoption of electronic informed consent (eConsent) for research remains low despite evidence of improved patient comprehension, usability, and workflow processes compared to paper. At our institution, we implemented an eConsent workflow using REDCap, a widely used electronic data capture system. The goal of this study was to evaluate the extent to which the REDCap eConsent solution adhered to federal guidance for eConsent. Of 29 requirements derived from sixteen recommendations from the United States Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the REDCap eConsent solution supported 24 (86%). To the best of our knowledge, this is among the first studies to evaluate an eConsent approach's support for federal guidance. Findings suggest use of REDCap may help other institutions overcome barriers to eConsent adoption, and that OHRP and FDA expand guidance to recommend eConsent solutions integrate with enterprise clinical and research information systems.

Identifiers

PMID31258968
PMCPMC6568140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.