Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31258942›Full record

ReviewArab journal of urology2019

Management of vaginal mesh exposure: A systematic review.

Andrew Bergersen, Cameron Hinkel, Joel Funk, Christian O Twiss

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Arab journal of urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. T‑shaped sling with modified posterior pelvic reconstruction: a technical note with video vignette.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Efficacy of the Sub-Urethral Transobturator KIM SystemJournal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Risk factors for stress urinary incontinence recurrence after midurethral sling revision.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Recurrent surgery in uterine prolapse: A nationwide register study.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2022
    Article
  13. Comparison of Two Single-Incision Mini-Slings for the Treatment of Incontinence.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew BergersenDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Cameron HinkelDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Joel FunkDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Christian O TwissDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA.
University of Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Mesh exposuremesh extrusionpelvic organ prolapsestress urinary incontinencevaginal mesh

Identifiers

PMID31258942
PMCPMC6583711
OpenAlexW2942094953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.